Re: 3NF question
From: Paul <paul_at_test.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2005 20:44:48 +0000
Message-ID: <41e58c41$0$16974$ed2e19e4_at_ptn-nntp-reader04.plus.net>
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2005 20:44:48 +0000
Message-ID: <41e58c41$0$16974$ed2e19e4_at_ptn-nntp-reader04.plus.net>
David Cressey wrote:
> First, there's the classical way, already illustrated by Joe Celko. If you
> name the columns "EMPLOYEE_ID" and "TRUCK_ID", the situation can't happen.
I'm not sure what the answer is to the whole naming question, but can't the column name "id" be interpreted in the context of the name of the table in which it appears?
Paul. Received on Wed Jan 12 2005 - 21:44:48 CET