Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> comp.databases.theory -> Re: 1GB Tables as Classes, or Tables as Types, and all that refuted

Re: 1GB Tables as Classes, or Tables as Types, and all that refuted

From: Jan Hidders <jan.hidders_at_REMOVETHIS.pandora.be>
Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2004 19:34:06 GMT
Message-ID: <Oc3sd.9013$%N2.394332@phobos.telenet-ops.be>


Alfredo Novoa wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Nov 2004 17:18:11 GMT, Jan Hidders <jan.hidders_at_REMOVETHIS.pandora.be> wrote:

>>Alfredo Novoa wrote:
>>>Then I can continue to think the same without worry :)
>>
>>Sure. If you are not worried by incorrect arguments....

>
> But it seems that you are not able to show any incorrection.

I already did that in this thread and you chose to ignore it.

>>Yes, and as anybody who has actually done some research on OODBMSs knows 
>>that is blatant nonsense. 

>
> What is nonsense are OODBMS and XMLDBMS research.

Just repeating a claim is not very interesting. Actually supplying some evidence for it would really help the discussion.

> It is clear that Date's arguments are dangerous for the OODBMS retro
> "researchers", and they don't seem to have any decent
> counter-argument, so they try to discredit Date's works with general
> and ad-hominem disqualifications.

Again, some evidence would be nice.

Received on Fri Dec 03 2004 - 13:34:06 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US