Re: Relational vs network vs hierarchic databases

From: Frank Hamersley <FrankHamersley_at_hotmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2004 10:17:05 GMT
Message-ID: <B0jod.44786$K7.11349_at_news-server.bigpond.net.au>


"Neo" wrote
>> I'm not prepared to abandon the relational model, until there is
>> something demonstrably better. "Demonstrably" doesn't quite mean
>> "proveably". The Wright brothers demonstrated that their flyer could
>> fly.
>
> What would something have to demonstrate to qualify as better?

It would have to outperform the competing technology in all (or enough) aspects to at least warrant the cost of adoption. If the gains were clearly significant (nay even compelling) then adoption would no doubt be extremely rapid.

> Could you give a simple concrete example?

Given that the prevalent technology is a (fairly) complex animal, it is naive at least to suggest a simple example would ever be adequate to demonstrate a pretender is superior in all aspects worth of consideration!

Cheers, Frank. Received on Mon Nov 22 2004 - 11:17:05 CET

Original text of this message