Re: Issues with the logical consistency of The Third Manifesto

From: Laconic2 <laconic2_at_comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2004 07:44:18 -0500
Message-ID: <wKadnW9l35O7awTcRVn-3w@comcast.com>

"Marshall Spight" <mspight_at_dnai.com> wrote in message news:dBhmd.102104$R05.62118_at_attbi_s53...
> "Laconic2" <laconic2_at_comcast.net> wrote in message
news:zdqdneWfr8Q8xwrcRVn-vg_at_comcast.com...
> >
> > I don't care whether you follow Codd or Date or Dawn or Neo, it's all
> > representation.
>
> This sentence really struck me. It's almost poetry.

Aw shucks!

>
> "Neo": new
> "Dawn": the first instant of sunlight
> "Date": a specific day
>
> "In the beginning, there was nothing. And on the first day, there
> was light. Then came ..."

Actually the Bible passage I was using as a model was I Corinthians 3:4. Received on Tue Nov 16 2004 - 06:44:18 CST