Re: Redundancy and NULLS in Xdb
From: Gene Wirchenko <genew_at_mail.ocis.net>
Date: Sun, 07 Nov 2004 15:31:42 -0800
Message-ID: <dmbto0pl7fggo6qb0o5othnkgi1u7stb3e_at_4ax.com>
Date: Sun, 07 Nov 2004 15:31:42 -0800
Message-ID: <dmbto0pl7fggo6qb0o5othnkgi1u7stb3e_at_4ax.com>
"Laconic2" <laconic2_at_comcast.net> wrote:
>For almost a year now, Neo has been "treating" us to presentations on how
>his "experimental database" represents complex data without using any
>redundancy or NULLs at the atomic level.
[snip]
>So Neo's Xdb. at the truly atomic level, is full of redundancy and NULLS.
^ Pronounced "wrong".
>Hence he hasn't even won his own contest!
Fine writing, fine writing.
>In case you are by any chance wondering.... the above is SATIRE!!!! Don't
>take ANY of this SERIOUSLY, OK?
Well, except for this part. Why spoil the joke?
Sincerely,
Gene Wirchenko
Computerese Irregular Verb Conjugation:
I have preferences. You have biases. He/She has prejudices.Received on Mon Nov 08 2004 - 00:31:42 CET