Re: Argument for 1NF by counter-example

"Laconic2" <laconic2_at_comcast.net> wrote:

>"robert" <gnuoytr_at_rcn.com> wrote in message
>news:da3c2186.0410241849.7eedc5ef_at_posting.google.com...
>> anyone else is welcome to refute Pascal, should they wish to.
>
>Almost everything Pascal says is drivel. QED.
>
>Now do you get the point?

     It may not be the point you intended. I have read a lot of Pascal's writing on dbdebunk.com. I see him using logic to advance an argument. This is in contrast to your statement above, which is not a refutation of Pascal, but merely an ad hom.

Sincerely,

Gene Wirchenko

Computerese Irregular Verb Conjugation:

     I have preferences.
     You have biases.
     He/She has prejudices.