Re: Argument for 1NF by counter-example

From: Laconic2 <laconic2_at_comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 09:40:23 -0400
Message-ID: <DuGdndQ6zoXNn-DcRVn-hg_at_comcast.com>


"robert" <gnuoytr_at_rcn.com> wrote in message news:da3c2186.0410241849.7eedc5ef_at_posting.google.com...
> anyone else is welcome to refute Pascal, should they wish to.

Almost everything Pascal says is drivel. QED.

Now do you get the point? Received on Mon Oct 25 2004 - 15:40:23 CEST

Original text of this message