Re: OO and relation "impedance mismatch"

"Kenneth Downs" <firstinit.lastname_at_lastnameplusfam.net> wrote in message news:0ec1kc.83b.ln_at_mercury.downsfam.net...

> I have not used Oracle yet seriously, but considering most colleagues who
> have tell me it can "everything", I would be willing to be a dollar that
it
> can somehow do it by another name. For instance, DB/2 calls it a
> "non-repeatable read", which name is self-explanatory, though perhaps it
> should have been called "potentially non-repeatable read."

It depends on what your colleagues mean by "everything". Maybe "everything" includes protecting you from dirty reads.

We know from this forum that "everything Oracle does" includes pissing off Dawn. Received on Wed Oct 06 2004 - 15:32:00 CDT