Re: OO and relation "impedance mismatch"
From: Kenneth Downs <firstinit.lastname_at_lastnameplusfam.net>
Date: Wed, 06 Oct 2004 17:14:25 -0400
Message-ID: <h7n1kc.tub.ln_at_mercury.downsfam.net>
> it
>
> It depends on what your colleagues mean by "everything". Maybe
> "everything" includes protecting you from dirty reads.
>
> We know from this forum that "everything Oracle does" includes pissing off
> Dawn.
Date: Wed, 06 Oct 2004 17:14:25 -0400
Message-ID: <h7n1kc.tub.ln_at_mercury.downsfam.net>
Laconic2 wrote:
>
> "Kenneth Downs" <firstinit.lastname_at_lastnameplusfam.net> wrote in message
> news:0ec1kc.83b.ln_at_mercury.downsfam.net...
>
>> I have not used Oracle yet seriously, but considering most colleagues who >> have tell me it can "everything", I would be willing to be a dollar that
> it
>> can somehow do it by another name. For instance, DB/2 calls it a >> "non-repeatable read", which name is self-explanatory, though perhaps it >> should have been called "potentially non-repeatable read."
>
> It depends on what your colleagues mean by "everything". Maybe
> "everything" includes protecting you from dirty reads.
>
> We know from this forum that "everything Oracle does" includes pissing off
> Dawn.
LOL
-- Kenneth Downs Use first initial plus last name at last name plus literal "fam.net" to email meReceived on Wed Oct 06 2004 - 23:14:25 CEST