Re: pre-FAQ

From: mAsterdam <mAsterdam_at_vrijdag.org>
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 08:42:31 +0200
Message-ID: <415907d9$0$78772$e4fe514c_at_news.xs4all.nl>


Dawn M. Wolthuis wrote:

> mAsterdam wrote:
>

>>Q: When did this newsgroup get started?
>>A: I don't know, but I found this:

>
>
> This should definitely go in the FAQ. Good job tracking it down.

Thank you. Here is another message. This one is at http://open-systems.ufl.edu/mirrors/ftp.isc.org/usenet/news.announce.newgroups/comp/comp.databases.theory

>
>
> From John.Roddick_at_levels.unisa.edu.au Sat Apr 4 02:42:44 1992
> Xref: rpi news.announce.newgroups:1730 news.groups:37198 comp.databases:13135 comp.ai:8594
> Newsgroups: news.announce.newgroups,news.groups,comp.databases,comp.ai
> Path: rpi!bounce-back
> From: John.Roddick_at_levels.unisa.edu.au
> Subject: RFD: comp.databases.theory
> Followup-To: news.groups
> Sender: tale_at_cs.rpi.edu
> Nntp-Posting-Host: cs.rpi.edu
> Organization: University of South Australia
> Date: 13 Jan 92 16:11:38 GMT
> Approved: tale_at_rpi.edu
> Lines: 21
>
> Maybe the time has come to set up another database newsgroup. The
> trouble with COMP.DATABASES is twofold. Firstly the volume of stuff
> posted makes it impossible to read it all, expecially when time is
> limited, and secondly, from my point of view (and I suspect others)
> most of the postings are too much problem solving ("I've got this
> problem with Oracle") and not enough discussion.
>
> How about the following:
> COMP.DATABASE - as now
> COMP.DATABASE.THEORY - discussion of db theory and paradigms
> COMP.DATABASE.AI \
> or - discussion of expert databases etc.
> COMP.AI.DATABASE / (if sufficient demand)
>
> John Roddick
> --
> School of Mathematics and Computer Studies | International +61 8 302 3463
> University of South Australia | Australian (08) 302 3463
> Levels Campus Pooraka | Internal ext. 3463
> South Australia 5095 | Fax (08) 302 3381
> Net: john.roddick_at_levels.unisa.edu.AU |
Received on Tue Sep 28 2004 - 08:42:31 CEST

Original text of this message