Re: pre-FAQ
From: Craig Alexander Morrison <reply_at_newsgroups.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 15:29:44 +0100
Message-ID: <41582598_at_212.67.96.135>
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 15:29:44 +0100
Message-ID: <41582598_at_212.67.96.135>
Oh, you mean the proper implementation of Domains?
Part of Relational Theory not yet implemented.
-- Slainte Craig Alexander Morrison "Dawn M. Wolthuis" <dwolt_at_tincat-group.comREMOVE> wrote in message news:cj88at$1or$1_at_news.netins.net...Received on Mon Sep 27 2004 - 16:29:44 CEST
> "Craig Alexander Morrison" <reply_at_newsgroups.com> wrote in message
> news:4157997c_at_212.67.96.135...
> > > Q: Is this group related only to relational database theory?
> > > A: No.
> >
> > There are no others where the word theory would apply properly!
> >
>
> Oh really? Please state your definition of "theory" that would disallow
> graph-based databases that include logical links for navigation (something
> not included in relational theory, IIRC)? --dawn
>
> >
> >
> > --
> > Slainte
> >
> > Craig Alexander Morrison
> >
> >
> > "Dawn M. Wolthuis" <dwolt_at_tincat-group.comREMOVE> wrote in message
> > news:cj84q0$1f2$1_at_news.netins.net...
> > >
> > > "mAsterdam" <mAsterdam_at_vrijdag.org> wrote in message
> > > news:4156858b$0$559$e4fe514c_at_news.xs4all.nl...
> > > > A new thread - you may have missed this.
> > > >
> > > > Kenneth Downs wrote:
> > > > > mAsterdam wrote:
> >
> >
>
>