Re: A possible issue with theory
From: Laconic2 <laconic2_at_comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 04:15:05 -0400
Message-ID: <9IqdnR5Iyde4G8_cRVn-vA_at_comcast.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 04:15:05 -0400
Message-ID: <9IqdnR5Iyde4G8_cRVn-vA_at_comcast.com>
"JohnD" <john_nospam_at_tech-testing.com> wrote in message news:EBf4d.23602$WZ.6198_at_newssvr24.news.prodigy.com...
Sorry, but I can't be of much help. My reaction to the database you
describe is that it's poorly designed,
for the purpose you are using it.
If there is any theoretical reason to do things that way I have yet to learn what it is.
The sad thing is that there are so many badly designed databases out there. Fixing up the mess provides employment, but you can't help wishing that more databases were designed right initially. Received on Thu Sep 23 2004 - 10:15:05 CEST