| Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid | |
Home -> Community -> Usenet -> comp.databases.theory -> Re: First Impressions on Using Alphora's Dataphor
"Marshall Spight" <mspight_at_dnai.com> wrote in message news:<52dZc.216184$8_6.123794_at_attbi_s04>...
> "Paul G. Brown" <paul_geoffrey_brown_at_yahoo.com> wrote in message news:57da7b56.0408310834.382e95e5_at_posting.google.com...
> >
> > On the other hand, the theory and practice of information management
> > continues to be important and to grow new limbs. How are we going to
> > cope with inputs from a pervasive computing infrastructure? What is the
> > most useful level of abstraction at which to view distributed hardware
> > resources? These challenges are driving requirements for which the
> > DBMS model of the world--either SQL DBMS or TR DBMS--is entirely unsuited.
>
> An interesting assertion. Do you have anything to back it up? To my mind,
> the relational model has a lot of relevance to the questions you ask.
(*sigh*)
This misreading of what I said is *precisely* the kind of 'mental
inhibitor'
I am talkin' about. I wrote (very carefully) that 'These challenges
are
driving requirements for which the DBMS model of the world--either
SQL DBMS
or TR DBMS--is entirely unsuited.'
I carefully defined DBMS. I said 'centralized, shared repository'.
This
systems model (DBMS = DataBase Management System) is unsuited to the
two
challenges I described because the information will be not be
centralized,
nor globally shared, and it will not be placed into a repository to
be
accessed again later. It will be highly decentralized, parts of it
will be
available to different users at differnet points in time, and it
will be
entirely volatile: it will be cheaper to go back to the original
source and
ask 'what was that again?' than to store it. Whatever systems are
created to
cope with these challenges, I am willing to bet that not a single
line of
code from a SQL DBMS or a TR DBMS will be used.
But you make a mild observation about the limits that might apply to
a True
Relational DBMS, and the relational zealots glance up, bleary-eyed,
from
their row of empty shot-glasses, and start flingin' peanuts at yer
head.
Sheesh. If anyone asks after me, tell 'em I'm hangin' out on alt.cranky-old-ex-DBMS-coots-who-are-working-on-other-problems-now-thank-you-very-much. Received on Wed Sep 01 2004 - 13:40:12 CDT
![]() |
![]() |