Re: First Impressions on Using Alphora's Dataphor
Date: 1 Sep 2004 11:40:12 -0700
Message-ID: <57da7b56.0409011040.7e14e505_at_posting.google.com>
"Marshall Spight" <mspight_at_dnai.com> wrote in message news:<52dZc.216184$8_6.123794_at_attbi_s04>...
> "Paul G. Brown" <paul_geoffrey_brown_at_yahoo.com> wrote in message news:57da7b56.0408310834.382e95e5@posting.google.com...
> >
> > On the other hand, the theory and practice of information management
> > continues to be important and to grow new limbs. How are we going to
> > cope with inputs from a pervasive computing infrastructure? What is the
> > most useful level of abstraction at which to view distributed hardware
> > resources? These challenges are driving requirements for which the
> > DBMS model of the world--either SQL DBMS or TR DBMS--is entirely unsuited.
>
> An interesting assertion. Do you have anything to back it up? To my mind,
> the relational model has a lot of relevance to the questions you ask.
(*sigh*)
But you make a mild observation about the limits that might apply to
a True
Relational DBMS, and the relational zealots glance up, bleary-eyed,
from
their row of empty shot-glasses, and start flingin' peanuts at yer
head.
Sheesh. If anyone asks after me, tell 'em I'm hangin' out on alt.cranky-old-ex-DBMS-coots-who-are-working-on-other-problems-now-thank-you-very-much. Received on Wed Sep 01 2004 - 20:40:12 CEST