Re: Date's updatable view rules
From: Lennart Jonsson <lennart_at_kommunicera.umea.se>
Date: 28 Jul 2004 11:05:48 -0700
Message-ID: <6dae7e65.0407281005.1c32584d_at_posting.google.com>
Date: 28 Jul 2004 11:05:48 -0700
Message-ID: <6dae7e65.0407281005.1c32584d_at_posting.google.com>
andrewst_at_onetel.net.uk (Tony) wrote in message news:<c0e3f26e.0407250414.65c609ab_at_posting.google.com>...
> "Marshall Spight" <mspight_at_dnai.com> wrote in message news:<l7vMc.20397$eM2.2889@attbi_s51>...
[...]
> My feeling is that view updating is nowhere near as straight-forward
> as has been suggested, and that the SQL vendors like Oracle don't
> allow many types of view update for good reason!
Sometime ago I visited a seminar where the problem where discussed. I
found the slides from the seminar at:
http://www.cs.umu.se/~hegner/Publications/Slides/updates02_slides.pdf
incase you'll find them interesting.
/Lennart Received on Wed Jul 28 2004 - 20:05:48 CEST