Re: A Normalization Question

From: x <x-false_at_yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 15:06:07 +0300
Message-ID: <4104f3ab$1@post.usenet.com>

• Post for FREE via your newsreader at post.usenet.com ****

"Neo" <neo55592_at_hotmail.com> wrote in message news:4b45d3ad.0407221116.791ea1ed_at_posting.google.com...

> True, and in every case the sequential symbols which compose the
> string are derived from the string itself in the SQL, not from an
> empty db.

> > ... the info is not coming from the SQL statement or from the string
"brown".
> Try removing 'brown' from your SQL and see if it works.

It could be replaced by a parametrized query that ask the user for the string.

The string is a sequence of symbols by definition. The string 'brown' has nothing special.
The spelling is a sequence of symbols by definition. So the info isn't coming from the particular string 'brown'.

It is more like:
All(x)(String(x) -->Spelling(x,x))
String("brown")

---

Spelling("brown","brown")

But one could say:
All(x)(String(x) <--->Spelling(x,x)).

Your representation of strings is redundant. Translations from one language to another are not made symbol by symbol.

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

• Usenet.com - The #1 Usenet Newsgroup Service on The Planet! *** http://www.usenet.com Unlimited Download - 19 Seperate Servers - 90,000 groups - Uncensored -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

Received on Mon Jul 26 2004 - 07:06:07 CDT