Re: A Normalization Question
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 15:06:07 +0300
Message-ID: <4104f3ab$1_at_post.usenet.com>
- Post for FREE via your newsreader at post.usenet.com ****
"Neo" <neo55592_at_hotmail.com> wrote in message news:4b45d3ad.0407221116.791ea1ed_at_posting.google.com...
> True, and in every case the sequential symbols which compose the
> string are derived from the string itself in the SQL, not from an
> empty db.
> > ... the info is not coming from the SQL statement or from the string
"brown".
> Try removing 'brown' from your SQL and see if it works.
It could be replaced by a parametrized query that ask the user for the string.
The string is a sequence of symbols by definition.
The string 'brown' has nothing special.
The spelling is a sequence of symbols by definition.
So the info isn't coming from the particular string 'brown'.
It is more like:
All(x)(String(x) -->Spelling(x,x))
String("brown")
Spelling("brown","brown")
But one could say:
All(x)(String(x) <--->Spelling(x,x)).
Your representation of strings is redundant. Translations from one language to another are not made symbol by symbol.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
- Usenet.com - The #1 Usenet Newsgroup Service on The Planet! *** http://www.usenet.com Unlimited Download - 19 Seperate Servers - 90,000 groups - Uncensored -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=