[OT] Re: table types

"Marshall Spight" <mspight_at_dnai.com> wrote in message news:6uQLc.141450$%_6.57745_at_attbi_s01...
> "Leandro Guimaraens Faria Corsetti Dutra" <leandro_at_dutra.fastmail.fm>
wrote in message
> news:pan.2004.07.22.12.20.13.373768_at_dutra.fastmail.fm...
> > Em Wed, 21 Jul 2004 16:53:04 +0000, Marshall Spight escreveu:
> >
> > > From the benchmarks I've seen over the years, it seems
> > > like the two most "generally fast" dbms are Oracle and
> > > MySQL
> >
> > Your benchmarks are seriously defective.
>
> I was speaking of dbmss that actually exist, and specific
> implementation techniques.
>
> For your statement to be meaningful, you have to show that
> there exist noticably faster alternatives. Note that saying that
> there might one day be faster alternatives is not relevant to my
> statement, because I am discussing current implementations.
> It is quite difficult to run benchmarks against software that
> hasn't been written yet.
>

Commonly referred to as VAPORWARE Received on Fri Jul 23 2004 - 03:21:56 CEST