Re: A Normalization Question
From: Jan Hidders <jan.hidders_at_REMOVETHIS.pandora.be>
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2004 19:34:24 GMT
Message-Id: <pan.2004.07.14.19.34.52.70458_at_REMOVETHIS.pandora.be>
>
> The type of redundancy that you are talking about is limited.
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2004 19:34:24 GMT
Message-Id: <pan.2004.07.14.19.34.52.70458_at_REMOVETHIS.pandora.be>
On Wed, 14 Jul 2004 10:27:03 -0700, Neo wrote:
>
> You do not know all data models.
Actualy, I have a pretty good overview and the data model of XDb1 is certainly nothing special.
> Your definitions do not allow you to recognize that following things are
> redundant: 'brown', 'brown', 'brown'.
You still haven't demonstrated that this is a bad thing.
>> The type of redundancy that you are talking about is irrelevant at the >> logical level.
>
> The type of redundancy that you are talking about is limited.
An unlimited type of redundancy would be meaningless and useless.
- Jan Hidders