Re: A Normalization Question
From: Neo <neo55592_at_hotmail.com>
Date: 12 Jul 2004 11:26:08 -0700
Message-ID: <4b45d3ad.0407121026.73a42717_at_posting.google.com>
Date: 12 Jul 2004 11:26:08 -0700
Message-ID: <4b45d3ad.0407121026.73a42717_at_posting.google.com>
Jan Hidders <jan.hidders_at_REMOVETHIS.pandora.be> wrote in message news:<o_zHc.180617$4h1.8788057_at_phobos.telenet-ops.be>...
> Neo wrote:
> >>>>You have failed to show that they represent the *same* fact.
> >>>
> >>>You have *failed* to define what is a fact?
> >>
> >>I did that elsewhere.
> >
> > My apologies. Could you please refer to that post or restate?
>
> A fact is a true proposition.
A very weak definition. Could you do better in context to dbs? What in a db is not a fact? Received on Mon Jul 12 2004 - 20:26:08 CEST