Re: A Normalization Question

From: Marshall Spight <mspight_at_dnai.com>
Date: Fri, 09 Jul 2004 07:52:19 GMT
Message-ID: <T8sHc.46098$MB3.5661@attbi_s04>

"Neo" <neo55592_at_hotmail.com> wrote in message news:4b45d3ad.0407081947.37c553f9_at_posting.google.com...
> > Because you're still confusing physical and logical
> > redundancy. And ironically, you're dragging normalization
> > down to physical storage, yet you're referring to it
> > as a "higher" form of normalization.
>
> Having the same person three times in a db is redundant.
> Having the same string three times in a db is redundant.
> Having the same thing three times in a db is redundant.

You keep treating redundancy and normalization as if they were the same things; they're not.

Marshall Received on Fri Jul 09 2004 - 02:52:19 CDT