Re: A Normalization Question

• Post for FREE via your newsreader at post.usenet.com ****

"Alan" <alan_at_erols.com> wrote in message news:2kj6rkF2vioiU1_at_uni-berlin.de...

> I get the feeling I'm wasting my time, but...

What is normal for one, isn't normal for everyone. :-)

> You do not understand
> redundancy in respect to relational theory.

It is hard to understand it.
There are many peoples who don't understand it :-)

> Redundancy (and
> Normalization!!!) in the RD world is based *exclusively* on Functional
> Dependencies.

Really ?

> Sorry if I was being redundant. You can report me to the...

Aren't we all ? :-)

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

• Usenet.com - The #1 Usenet Newsgroup Service on The Planet! *** http://www.usenet.com Unlimited Download - 19 Seperate Servers - 90,000 groups - Uncensored -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=