Re: A Normalization Question
From: x <x-false_at_yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2004 15:57:52 +0300
Message-ID: <40e55ab8_at_post.usenet.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2004 15:57:52 +0300
Message-ID: <40e55ab8_at_post.usenet.com>
- Post for FREE via your newsreader at post.usenet.com ****
"Alan" <alan_at_erols.com> wrote in message news:2kj6rkF2vioiU1_at_uni-berlin.de...
> I get the feeling I'm wasting my time, but...
What is normal for one, isn't normal for everyone. :-)
> You do not understand
> redundancy in respect to relational theory.
It is hard to understand it.
There are many peoples who don't understand it :-)
> Redundancy (and
> Normalization!!!) in the RD world is based *exclusively* on Functional
> Dependencies.
Really ?
> Sorry if I was being redundant. You can report me to the...
Aren't we all ? :-)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
- Usenet.com - The #1 Usenet Newsgroup Service on The Planet! *** http://www.usenet.com Unlimited Download - 19 Seperate Servers - 90,000 groups - Uncensored -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=