Re: One Ring to Bind Them

From: Dawn M. Wolthuis <dwolt_at_tincat-group.comREMOVE>
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 20:19:40 -0500
Message-ID: <cbt4fk$90q$1_at_news.netins.net>


"Marshall Spight" <mspight_at_dnai.com> wrote in message

news:nnIDc.125667$Sw.113988_at_attbi_s51...
> "Bill H" <wphaskett_at_THISISMUNGEDatt.net> wrote in message
news:IbHDc.119764$HG.109138_at_attbi_s53...

> > "Marshall Spight" <mspight_at_dnai.com> wrote in message
> > news:GipDc.159689$3x.28156_at_attbi_s54...
> > >
> > > Perhaps I misunderstand, but MV has only the one kind of
> > > relationship it is capable of understanding: containment.

I should have read from the top of the topic down, but I now understand what you mean. As far as the database itself, without any triggers written, nor any application code, the only relationship "between relations" that it understands is that of parent-child. --dawn Received on Wed Jun 30 2004 - 03:19:40 CEST

Original text of this message