Re: c.d.theory glossary -- definition of "class"
Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2004 13:12:13 +0300
Message-ID: <40dbf971_at_post.usenet.com>
- Post for FREE via your newsreader at post.usenet.com ****
"mAsterdam" <mAsterdam_at_vrijdag.org> wrote in message
news:40db6567$0$559$e4fe514c_at_news.xs4all.nl...
> x wrote:
> > ... Class is an overloaded word :-)
They are both overloaded.
> OTOH... that must mean you can give several relevant
> definitons! Yey! :-)
No. It means that I am aware it is used to mean a bunch of things :-)
> > No. The actors act and the operators operate. :-)
> > The behavior create types. :-)
> How?
What how ?
How the actors act ?
How the operators operate ?
How the behavior create types ?
Haven't you heard the expressions "stupid people" , "you are a troll", etc. ?
> > And there are different types of behavior. :-)
> > And operators have types. :-)
> Sloppy.
> Operands have *a* type.
> The result of an operator is typed.
> An operator has type constraints; it can only
> operate on operands of certain types.
> > Funny :-)
> Am I spoiling the fun?
No. I appreciate the work you are doing. But sometimes it is necessary to inject some noise for escaping from local minima. :-)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
- Usenet.com - The #1 Usenet Newsgroup Service on The Planet! *** http://www.usenet.com Unlimited Download - 19 Seperate Servers - 90,000 groups - Uncensored -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=