Re: database systems and organizational intelligence

From: Dawn M. Wolthuis <dwolt_at_tincat-group.com>
Date: Fri, 28 May 2004 12:52:41 -0500
Message-ID: <c97u9j$qks$1_at_news.netins.net>


"x" <x-false_at_yahoo.com> wrote in message news:40b74d14$1_at_post.usenet.com...
> **** Post for FREE via your newsreader at post.usenet.com ****
>
>
> "Alfredo Novoa" <alfredo_at_ncs.es> wrote in message
> news:40b71403.618699_at_news-read3.maxwell.syr.edu...
> > On Thu, 27 May 2004 14:36:44 +0300, "x" <x-false_at_yahoo.com> wrote:
> >
> > >OK.
> > >As you have seen, your statement that "Everybody knows" is not true.
> >
> > Indeed, I was too optimist.
>
> I had a revelation :-)
> Data consists of "pointers" to the outside of the computer.
> Code consists of "pointers" to the inside of the computer.
> Unless the data is about the inside of the computer ...

I kinda like that. "Pointers" of course, form the domain of a function that maps the pointers to whatever they are referencing. It's all functions ;-)

> > >A code is a set of rules (of behavior, of encoding) but is also used to
> > >denote the result of encoding.
> >
> > No, it is not a set of rules, it is a sequence of instructions.
>
> A sequence of keystrokes can be seen as a sequence of instructions.
> So data entry must be coding ...

Yup, it's all data, it's all functions. smiles. --dawn Received on Fri May 28 2004 - 19:52:41 CEST

Original text of this message