Re: Noninferential vs. inferential DBMS

From: Alfredo Novoa <alfredo_at_ncs.es>
Date: Fri, 14 May 2004 12:29:56 GMT
Message-ID: <40a4bba0.3472673_at_news.wanadoo.es>

On Thu, 13 May 2004 08:44:00 -0700, Gene Wirchenko <genew_at_mail.ocis.net> wrote:

> That was not the question though. OP asked "is" not "could be"?
>To answer the question asked requires a proof. To say yes to your
>version requires but one example.

IMS is not inferential. QED.

Regards
Alfredo Received on Fri May 14 2004 - 14:29:56 CEST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Dawn M. Wolthuis: "Re: Wishing trolls away"
Previous message: Alfredo Novoa: "Re: Ah, but who has better parties?"
Maybe in reply to: x: "Re: Noninferential vs. inferential DBMS"
In reply to Gene Wirchenko: "Re: Noninferential vs. inferential DBMS"
Next in thread: Dawn M. Wolthuis: "Re: Wishing trolls away"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message