Re: Ah, but who has better parties?

From: Alfredo Novoa <alfredo_at_ncs.es>
Date: Fri, 14 May 2004 12:28:36 GMT
Message-ID: <40a4bb2f.3359921_at_news.wanadoo.es>

On Fri, 14 May 2004 08:07:09 GMT, "mountain man" <hobbit_at_southern_seaweed.com.op> wrote:

>> Date books don't ignore the problem of industry and business: the poor
>> intellectual level of most practicioners. But he can't do miracles.
>
>
>Why not? ;-)

Because miracles are impossible by definition :-)

Regards
Alfredo Received on Fri May 14 2004 - 14:28:36 CEST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Alfredo Novoa: "Re: Noninferential vs. inferential DBMS"
Previous message: Alfredo Novoa: "Re: Date is Incomplete - database application software and database theory"
Maybe in reply to: Dawn M. Wolthuis: "Ah, but who has better parties?"
In reply to Alfredo Novoa: "Re: Ah, but who has better parties?"
Next in thread: Alfredo Novoa: "Re: Noninferential vs. inferential DBMS"
Reply: x: "Re: Ah, but who has better parties?"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message