Re: Ah, but who has better parties?

From: Paul G. Brown <paul_geoffrey_brown_at_yahoo.com>
Date: 13 May 2004 16:16:11 -0700
Message-ID: <57da7b56.0405131516.709eda7c_at_posting.google.com>

Leandro Guimarães Faria Corsetti Dutra <leandro_at_dutra.fastmail.fm> wrote in message news:<pan.2004.05.13.12.08.23.162778_at_dutra.fastmail.fm>...

> ... just popular Anglo-Saxon with the
> typical contempt for Science and infatuation with pragmatism.

Now just hold it right there a dawg-gawn minute.

I'm ain't Anglo-Saxon (close though) but it's precisely my infatuation with pragmatism that *interests* me in the R model. Received on Fri May 14 2004 - 01:16:11 CEST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Paul: "Re: Transitive Closure"
Previous message: Paul: "Re: Noninferential vs. inferential DBMS"
Maybe in reply to: Dawn M. Wolthuis: "Ah, but who has better parties?"
In reply to Leandro Guimarães Faria Corsetti Dutra: "Re: Ah, but who has better parties?"
Next in thread: Mike Preece: "Re: Ah, but who has better parties?"
Reply: Leandro Guimarães Faria Corsetti Dutra: "Re: Ah, but who has better parties?"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message