Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> comp.databases.theory -> Re: Date's First Great Blunder

Re: Date's First Great Blunder

From: Dawn M. Wolthuis <dwolt_at_tincat-group.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 13:52:06 -0500
Message-ID: <c66ft9$kgf$1@news.netins.net>


"Laconic2" <laconic2_at_comcast.net> wrote in message news:EsadnYfYjbB-Ihvd4p2dnA_at_comcast.com...
> > If NULLs are not necessary and increase complexity too much, why
> > doesn't Date drop the chapter on NULL/Missing Information?
> >
>
> Ahhh! I can see it now!
>
> (This chapter intentionally left blank)
>
>
> What a commentary on NULLs that would make!

Very clever, but I do think it would be important not to state WHY it was left out -- whether it was by intention or omission, right? --dawn Received on Wed Apr 21 2004 - 13:52:06 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US