Re: Date's First Great Blunder
From: Dawn M. Wolthuis <dwolt_at_tincat-group.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 13:52:06 -0500
Message-ID: <c66ft9$kgf$1_at_news.netins.net>
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 13:52:06 -0500
Message-ID: <c66ft9$kgf$1_at_news.netins.net>
"Laconic2" <laconic2_at_comcast.net> wrote in message
news:EsadnYfYjbB-Ihvd4p2dnA_at_comcast.com...
> > If NULLs are not necessary and increase complexity too much, why
> > doesn't Date drop the chapter on NULL/Missing Information?
> >
>
> Ahhh! I can see it now!
>
> (This chapter intentionally left blank)
>
>
> What a commentary on NULLs that would make!
Very clever, but I do think it would be important not to state WHY it was left out -- whether it was by intention or omission, right? --dawn Received on Wed Apr 21 2004 - 20:52:06 CEST