Re: c.d.theory glossary

From: mAsterdam <mAsterdam_at_vrijdag.org>
Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2004 12:51:19 +0200
Message-ID: <40825da7$0$566$e4fe514c_at_news.xs4all.nl>

Dawn M. Wolthuis wrote:

> mAsterdam wrote:

>>...If it is appreciated, I'll post the glossary once in a while.
>>
>>P.S. 2
>>Should I include credits?

>
> not from within this group, in my opinion, but if you are using defs from
> elsewhere then in-line "notes" would be in order

Ok - until somebody convinces me to do otherwise. As a consequence, to all contributors:
if you want your name stated please say so.

This glossary can only help if more people participate. Received on Sun Apr 18 2004 - 12:51:19 CEST