Re: c.d.theory glossary

From: Jan Hidders <>
Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2004 11:01:07 GMT
Message-ID: <Tdtgc.75844$>

Laconic2 wrote:
> How about using some existing dictionaires as a base, or as linked
> references. There are FOLDOC, Wikipedia, and the Web Dictionary of
> Cybernetics and Systems, for starters.

I'd advice . You can enter your definitions there right now and link them up with all the other articles there. If necessary you can add a "namespace" so instead of [[tuple]] you could make an article for [[tuple (relational model)]] but that should be kept to a minimum. However, Wikipedia is not meant as a dictionary, which means that entries should have the potential of a full encyclopedia article. It's still ok to start them with just a definition, however, and I believe all the terms in your list would be acceptable.

  • Jan Hidders
Received on Sun Apr 18 2004 - 13:01:07 CEST

Original text of this message