Re: Objects and messages

From: Alfredo Novoa <alfredo_at_ncs.es>
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2004 12:40:56 GMT
Message-ID: <407e81b5.8360641_at_news.wanadoo.es>

On Wed, 14 Apr 2004 20:13:44 GMT, "D Guntermann" <guntermann_at_hotmail.com> wrote:

>> >Is a message an object?
>> >
>> >Is an object a message?
>>
>> No, a message is an operator invocation.
>
>Couldn't an operator invocation be considered a mechanism for either
>generating or consuming messages (a message is a conceptual object that
>conveys some measure of informational value, yes?)?

Well, I forgot that object might mean everything including operator invocation :-)

Regards

Alfredo Received on Thu Apr 15 2004 - 14:40:56 CEST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Laconic2: "Re: Another Pizza Question"
Previous message: Alfredo Novoa: "Re: Date's First Great Blunder"
Maybe in reply to: Laconic2: "Objects and messages"
In reply to Laconic2: "Objects and messages"
Next in thread: Laconic2: "Re: Another Pizza Question"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message