Re: How is this collection called?

From: Timothy J. Bruce <uniblab_at_hotmail.com>
Date: 7 Apr 2004 15:38:16 -0700
Message-ID: <34519632.0404071438.45b9cda2_at_posting.google.com>

Laconic2 et al:

Russel's Paradox is also neatly sidestepped by Russel's, Whitehead's, and Church's work in Type Theory, meaning Laws of Form (which may have much to offer) are not required in this case, making them irrelevent and orthogonal.

Touch�,
Timothy J. Bruce
uniblab_at_hotmail.com
</RANT> Received on Thu Apr 08 2004 - 00:38:16 CEST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Tom Hester: "Re: Date of Birth as an attribute"
Previous message: Dawn M. Wolthuis: "Re: Pizza Example"
Maybe in reply to: Timothy J. Bruce: "Re: How is this collection called?"
Next in thread: Tom Hester: "Re: Date of Birth as an attribute"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message