Re: How is this collection called?

From: Timothy J. Bruce <>
Date: 7 Apr 2004 15:38:16 -0700
Message-ID: <>

Laconic2 et al:

Russel's Paradox is also neatly sidestepped by Russel's, Whitehead's, and Church's work in Type Theory, meaning Laws of Form (which may have much to offer) are not required in this case, making them irrelevent and orthogonal.

Timothy J. Bruce
</RANT> Received on Thu Apr 08 2004 - 00:38:16 CEST

Original text of this message