Re: Relational and multivalue databases

From: rkc <rkc_at_yabba.dabba.do.rochester.rr.bomb>
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 14:35:46 GMT
Message-ID: <6R3Zb.68481$n62.22917_at_twister.nyroc.rr.com>

"Paul" <paul_at_not.a.chance.ie> wrote in message news:MPG.1a9dfe9a8c21ef0b9898d0_at_news1.eircom.net...
>
>
> bbadour_at_golden.net says...
>
>
> > > The databases you referenced are not relational.
>
> > Again, it suffices to note that Dawn is ignorant and is burning a straw
man.
>
>
> Just a quibble, but doesn't one demolish a straw man?

"They tore my legs off and they threw them over there." "Then they took my chest out and they threw it over there."

The Scarecrow - The Wizard of Oz Received on Thu Feb 19 2004 - 15:35:46 CET

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Dawn M. Wolthuis: "Re: Codd provided appropriate mathematics ... (was Re: Relational and MV (response to "foundations of relational theory"))"
Previous message: Eric Kaun: "Re: Relational and MV (response to "foundations of relational theory")"
Maybe in reply to: Eric Kaun: "Relational and multivalue databases"
In reply to Paul: "Re: Relational and multivalue databases"
Next in thread: Bob Badour: "Re: DatePart"
Reply: Marshall Spight: "Re: Relational and multivalue databases"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message