Re: TransRelational

Clinging to sanity, hungrylion2002_at_yahoo.ca (HungryLion) mumbled into her beard:
> TransRelational must be like Sibelius Symphony No. 8: A Platonic
> masterpiece!
>
> http://www.dbdebunk.com/page/page/806810.htm
>
> "Regarding the TransRelational™ Model, DK and am not very hopeful in
> the near future. After all, it's the right thing, so why should you
> expect it'll fly? And what makes you think it will be appreciated
> amidst ignorance?"

Unfortunately, Pascal's essay doesn't really get past throwing muck at whomever comes bearing news about Prevayler.

If he's going to ridicule it in public, it does NOT suffice to write "A few readers sent me URLs I recall skimming thru them and decided they were a waste of time, too much crap to bother with. I still have the URLs but don't have time to dig into old mail to locate them"

If he hasn't the time to give a more comprehensive commentary, then he should probably go with his earlier thoughts:

  "Those things come out of the woodwork in tons and there is neither   time, nor any point to bother. One must be very selective in   responding."

If he's not prepared to respond with some attempt at respect, and give a comprehensive answer, then it would seem wiser to be a bit more selective, and perhaps not respond at all.

-- 
"cbbrowne","_at_","ntlug.org"
http://www.ntlug.org/~cbbrowne/sap.html
"Have  you noticed   that,  when we were   young,  we were   told that
`everybody else   is doing  it' was   a  really  stupid reason  to  do
something,  but now it's the standard  reason for picking a particular
software package?" -- Barry Gehm