Re: OOP - a question about database access

"Uncle Bob (Robert C. Martin)" <u.n.c.l.e.b.o.b_at_objectmentor.com> wrote in message <news:nucirv8q2j2horrto5i6dtrmpi5smhsdtc_at_4ax.com>...

> "Paul Vernon" <paul.vernon_at_ukk.ibmm.comm> might (or might not) have
> written this on (or about) Mon, 17 Nov 2003 19:22:19 -0000, :
>
> >"Bob Badour" <bbadour_at_golden.net> wrote in message
> >news:xPSdnQQCLvchdjOiRVn-gg_at_golden.net...
> >> "Alain Javier Guarnieri del Gesu" <nntp_at_ajgdg.com> wrote in message
> >> news:slrnbqtmlr.euq.nntp_at_ajgdg.com.invalid...
> >> > Perhaps in the world databases and buisness applications, OO is
> >> > nothing special. I was simply curious if you felt that notions like
> >> > encapsulation, polymorhism, aggregation, and inhertience have had
> >> > their day.
> >>
> >> Encapsulation: Physical and logical independence have great importantance
> >> and I foresee no change to reduce their importance.
> >
> >Agreed, but do the OO guys understand it as no more that just that?
>
> No, there are those of us who think that polymorphism is even more
> important than encapsulation.

Which kind of polymorphism? Static or dynamic, interfaces or code inheritance, Third Manifesto or non-circular circle, etc.?

--
Joe Foster <mailto:jlfoster%40znet.com>     Got Thetans? <http://www.xenu.net/>
WARNING: I cannot be held responsible for the above        They're   coming  to
because  my cats have  apparently  learned to type.        take me away, ha ha!