Re: OOP - a question about database access

"Paul Vernon" <paul.vernon_at_ukk.ibmm.comm> wrote in message news:bpb7bl$1ndg$1_at_gazette.almaden.ibm.com...
> "Bob Badour" <bbadour_at_golden.net> wrote in message
> news:xPSdnQQCLvchdjOiRVn-gg_at_golden.net...
> > "Alain Javier Guarnieri del Gesu" <nntp_at_ajgdg.com> wrote in message
> > news:slrnbqtmlr.euq.nntp_at_ajgdg.com.invalid...
> > > Perhaps in the world databases and buisness applications, OO is
> > > nothing special. I was simply curious if you felt that notions like
> > > encapsulation, polymorhism, aggregation, and inhertience have had
> > > their day.
> >
> > Encapsulation: Physical and logical independence have great
importantance
> > and I foresee no change to reduce their importance.
>
> Agreed, but do the OO guys understand it as no more that just that?
>
> http://www.dbpd.com/vault/9809date.html

This OO guy understands it. It is difficult to say whether any of the others understand much at all. Received on Tue Nov 18 2003 - 02:11:55 CET