Re: OOP - a question about database access

From: Uncle Bob (Robert C. Martin) <u.n.c.l.e.b.o.b_at_objectmentor.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 14:47:53 -0600
Message-ID: <nucirv8q2j2horrto5i6dtrmpi5smhsdtc@4ax.com>

"Paul Vernon" <paul.vernon_at_ukk.ibmm.comm> might (or might not) have written this on (or about) Mon, 17 Nov 2003 19:22:19 -0000, :

>"Bob Badour" <bbadour_at_golden.net> wrote in message
>news:xPSdnQQCLvchdjOiRVn-gg_at_golden.net...
>> "Alain Javier Guarnieri del Gesu" <nntp_at_ajgdg.com> wrote in message
>> news:slrnbqtmlr.euq.nntp_at_ajgdg.com.invalid...
>> > Perhaps in the world databases and buisness applications, OO is
>> > nothing special. I was simply curious if you felt that notions like
>> > encapsulation, polymorhism, aggregation, and inhertience have had
>> > their day.
>>
>> Encapsulation: Physical and logical independence have great importantance
>> and I foresee no change to reduce their importance.
>
>Agreed, but do the OO guys understand it as no more that just that?

No, there are those of us who think that polymorphism is even more important than encapsulation.

Robert C. Martin    | "Uncle Bob"                   
Object Mentor Inc.  | unclebob @ objectmentor . com
501 N. Riverside Dr.| Tel: (800) 338-6716         
Suite 206           | Fax: (847) 775-8174           | www.objectmentor.com
                    |                               | www.XProgramming.com
Gurnee, IL,         | Training and Mentoring        | www.junit.org
60031               | OO, XP, Agile, C++, Java, C#  | http://fitnesse.org

Received on Mon Nov 17 2003 - 14:47:53 CST