Re: foundations of relational theory?

With all due respect, one explanation post is worth about a dozen attributions. I suggest you will save resources by leaving the attributions in place.

"byrmol" <member27348_at_dbforums.com> wrote in message news:3570205.1068169804_at_dbforums.com...
>
> >
>
> > Bob said....
>
> > It would be easier to follow things if you did not cut out all the
>
> > attributions. Who are you talking to? And about what?
>
> >
>
>
>
> Sorry Bob, just trying to save a bit of bandwidth. I'm in country
> Australia with a 2-way satellite connection that has a download/price
> ratio that would would send Bill Gates broke. Perhaps if I try and
> duplicate data integrity rules at each tier I would have more money and
> could be a little more detailed in my responses.... ;-)
>
>
>
> Because they appear on the same page as my response I thought it would
> be almost self evident. I must remeber that not everyone actually
> interfaces to this forum.
>
>
>
> But in order of quotes: ( I won't repeat them because of the
> economics..)
>
>
>
> Chandru Murthi
>
> Chandru Murthi
>
> Mikito Harakiri
>
> Mikito Harakiri
>
>
> --
> Posted via http://dbforums.com
Received on Fri Nov 07 2003 - 03:16:33 CET