Re: OOP - a question about database access
Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2003 13:12:58 -0600
Message-ID: <577lqv8fo1lsl9h34lkqmb0b4hodjg9ic0_at_4ax.com>
"Bob Badour" <bbadour_at_golden.net> might (or might not) have written this on (or about) Wed, 5 Nov 2003 13:10:55 -0500, :
>They declared a deadline at about a tenth or less of the time required and
>asked for the whole enchilada. They then beat up the developers for failing
>to deliver, but urged them to do better for the next timebox... I found it
>abusive, wasteful and counterproductive.
Yes. That's called Management By Objects (MBO). It's also called stupid.
>I have no problems with realistic deadlines or with managers who actually
>manage. Prioritizing features and making realistic assessments of what the
>team can deliver in the time available is simply management--as is adjusting
>the target feature list as development progresses.
Agreed.
>I see no need for special names for a manager just doing his or her job.
And we already have a name for managers that don't.
Robert C. Martin | "Uncle Bob" Object Mentor Inc. | unclebob _at_ objectmentor . com 501 N. Riverside Dr.| Tel: (800) 338-6716 Suite 206 | Fax: (847) 775-8174 | www.objectmentor.com | | www.XProgramming.com Gurnee, IL, | Training and Mentoring | www.junit.org 60031 | OO, XP, Agile, C++, Java, C# | http://fitnesse.orgReceived on Thu Nov 06 2003 - 20:12:58 CET