Re: foundations of relational theory? - some references for the truly starving

Personally, I find a number of poster's comments distasteful and... well... ugly. Initially I just wanted to ignore this entire thread because of the level of backbiting and childishness that I've read. In order to get around the discomfort of reading the commentary posted, I've used the strong language to paint an image of the person and his character... and I laugh.

Finally, I can say that these words *do* serve a purpose (albeit a selfish one!)

Albert

"frostalicious" <frostyj_at_nospam.com> wrote in message news:vqh02p8j8endef_at_corp.supernews.com...
> > "Laura Hirsh" <lhirsh_at_gate.net> wrote in message
> > news:tHBpb.4836$Oo4.2312_at_newsread1.news.atl.earthlink.net...
> >> Mr. Badour,
> >>
> >> Frankly, you sir (and I use that term loosely), are an ass. I am
> >> tired of your uneducated, unprofessional, snide comments that serve
> >> no purpose. Get a life!!!
> >
> > Let us hypothesize that it is rude of Bob to refer to people using
> > words such as "idiot", "stupid" etc. Let us hypothesize that these
> > words serve no purpose.
> >
> Marshall Spight wrote:
> > Is it then also rude to refer to Bob using words such as "ass",
> > "unprofessional" and "snide"?
> I suppose so.
>
> > Does doing so also serve no purpose?
> I think there's a purpose. Although it seems to be wasted,
> the purpose was to minimize further snide comments.
>
> > If not, could someone explain why?
> I'll try.
>
> > Is "he started it" sufficient justification?
> In most parts of Usenet, yes.
>
> > I am actually curious as to the mental process that leads
> > people to condemn with inflammatory language others
> > for their use of inflammatory language.
>
> I would call it frustration.
>
> > Or am I missing the issue somehow?
> >
> > Marshall
>
> With the high expectation of courtesy from posters to
> groups for professionals (cdp) and scientists (cdt,)
> plus another, higher level of expectation from the
> (allegedly) more educated and more intelligent, Bob's
> indiscretions seem especially uncalled for.
>
> The response to the incivilities initiated by Bob seems
> rather tame and late in coming; I'm surprised so many
> cut him so much slack for so long. He would hear far
> worse, far sooner, in just about any other n/g. Usenet's
> a pretty wild and wooly place, for the most part, and
> in many groups Bob's crasser posts would have
> triggered an immediate assault by a number of group
> regulars, in far harsher terms than I've seen here.
>
> Maybe Bob could repeatedly call everybody in
> alt.trucks.ford with a 7.3L PSD an "idiot," and we
> could compare the response!
>
> -- frosty
>
>
Received on Wed Nov 05 2003 - 06:13:52 CET