Re: Representing data on disk in an MV database - was Re: foundations of relational theory? - some references for the truly starving
From: Mike Preece <michael_at_preece.net>
Date: 23 Oct 2003 18:35:23 -0700
Message-ID: <1b0b566c.0310231735.766ca1b8_at_posting.google.com>
Date: 23 Oct 2003 18:35:23 -0700
Message-ID: <1b0b566c.0310231735.766ca1b8_at_posting.google.com>
"Mikito Harakiri" <mikharakiri_at_iahu.com> wrote in message news:<S7Zlb.29$xI.157_at_news.oracle.com>...
> "Mike Preece" <michael_at_preece.net> wrote in message
> news:1b0b566c.0310231443.4ce7517f_at_posting.google.com...
> > Apology not necessary. Thanks anyway - it's like a breath of fresh
> > air.
> > Char(255) = End of item mark
> > Char(254) = Attribute mark
> > Char(253) = Value mark
> > Char(252) = SubValue mark
>
> Fresh air? Where did you dig that corpse from the 60s? Even XML (which
> smells a lot too) is more inventive with their field delimeters.
If you don't mind Mik...
Maybe you can find something useful to do? Received on Fri Oct 24 2003 - 03:35:23 CEST