Re: Representing data on disk in an MV database - was Re: foundations of relational theory? - some references for the truly starving
From: Mikito Harakiri <mikharakiri_at_iahu.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2003 15:54:25 -0700
Message-ID: <S7Zlb.29$xI.157_at_news.oracle.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2003 15:54:25 -0700
Message-ID: <S7Zlb.29$xI.157_at_news.oracle.com>
"Mike Preece" <michael_at_preece.net> wrote in message
news:1b0b566c.0310231443.4ce7517f_at_posting.google.com...
> Apology not necessary. Thanks anyway - it's like a breath of fresh
> air.
> Char(255) = End of item mark
> Char(254) = Attribute mark
> Char(253) = Value mark
> Char(252) = SubValue mark
Fresh air? Where did you dig that corpse from the 60s? Even XML (which smells a lot too) is more inventive with their field delimeters. Received on Fri Oct 24 2003 - 00:54:25 CEST