Re: semantic data structure/web architecture and innate logic

Originally posted by Bob Badour

> Innate human memory provides 100% accurate knowledge
> retrieval?!? plonk

> Yeah, I see... Dude, it's INNATE HUMAN LOGIC, not memory. Cool thing
> is the machine memory is the best. Ours (mine, anyway) sucks. We're
> chasing the content processing. Our system processes at logN speeds
> and saves countless memory allocation space. Faster, leaner, and
> SMARTER.

> "Wick" <member37571_at_dbforums.com> wrote in message

> news:3325673.1062615713_at_dbforums.com"]news:3325673.1062615713_at_d-
> bforums.com[/url]...

> > Hi:

> > The way our semantic system works is inherently different than
> the

> > traditional db/rdb. While dba's must define relationships and
> create

> > rows, columns, tables and fields (static), ours does not require
> the

> > implementation of these things to create dynamic relationships-
> we call

> > the semantic data structure, "dynamic" for this reason, amonst
> others.

> > From readers' opinions and comments, I am seeing that people are
> trying

> > to "normalize" our semantic structure into a rd model- which is
> really

> > not possible. I am speaking language of: "semantic data
> structure" and

> > we are not communicating. All Roads Lead to Rome, so if I can
> state or

> > demonstrate we arrive at the same place, then perhaps, I'm
> achieving

> > part of my goal for this post.

> > But I want to stress the structure I am discussing is as -or more-
>

> > useful in the same application space as the static traditonal
> one you

> > all use everyday. I need to prove that!

> > This system is built on a new model of human cognition and
> simulated

> > dual memory. A two column system only. When two column memory
> is

> > unified with underlying cognitive functionalities, innate logic
> occurrs-

> > just as in human brain. The two column memory contains a
> perceptual

> > (data) memory and a conceptual (metadata) memory- conscious
> and

> > subconscious, if you prefer. Multiple relations (one-to-many,
> many-to-

> > one and many-to-many) can be established between the elements of
> two

> > memories and when new data is introduced to existing ones
> ("is

> > learned"), it falls automatically ing into dynamic relationships
> with

> > existing data in memory. A Porsche is European, red, flashy,
> fast, high

> > speed, two seater... the new word Porsche is categorized right
> along

> > with existing data that has these same relationships and is
> categorized

> > in the same group as Ferrari, Lamborghini, BMW and so on. It is
> NOT

> > categorized with Mustang, GTO, Accura, Toyota or Corvette
> because it is

> > not related with "European". You KNOW the difference! Thus, we
> also

> > achieve auto-categorization and specificity in retrieval. What
> is

> > "innate human logic" in terms of semantic data structure? It is
> the

> > same functionality which allows us to establish logical
> dynamic

> > relationships amongst the data we learn everyday. Also to
> retrieve

> > knowledge with 100% accuracy. Further, it provides
> contextual

> > disambiguation, and provides universal grammar.

> > What I am trying to understand is if what I am claiming about
> the

> > semantic data structure makes any sense to any db experts. I
> guess I'm

> > talking a different language... Would love to find a common road
> to

> > get to Rome.

> > I'd be happy to send more information by email to anyone that
> might have

> > a deeper interest. I've attached another document discussing how
> we may

> > utilize this structure as a next gen semantic web
> architecture.

> > Thanks again!

> > Wick

> > --

> Posted via

    http://dbforums.com/http://dbforums.com     

--
Posted via http://dbforums.com