Re: semantic data structure/web architecture and innate logic

Innate human memory provides 100% accurate knowledge retrieval?!? plonk

"Wick" <member37571_at_dbforums.com> wrote in message news:3325673.1062615713_at_dbforums.com...
>
> Hi:
>
> The way our semantic system works is inherently different than the
> traditional db/rdb. While dba's must define relationships and create
> rows, columns, tables and fields (static), ours does not require the
> implementation of these things to create dynamic relationships- we call
> the semantic data structure, "dynamic" for this reason, amonst others.
>
> From readers' opinions and comments, I am seeing that people are trying
> to "normalize" our semantic structure into a rd model- which is really
> not possible. I am speaking language of: "semantic data structure" and
> we are not communicating. All Roads Lead to Rome, so if I can state or
> demonstrate we arrive at the same place, then perhaps, I'm achieving
> part of my goal for this post.
>
> But I want to stress the structure I am discussing is as -or more-
> useful in the same application space as the static traditonal one you
> all use everyday. I need to prove that!
>
> This system is built on a new model of human cognition and simulated
> dual memory. A two column system only. When two column memory is
> unified with underlying cognitive functionalities, innate logic occurrs-
> just as in human brain. The two column memory contains a perceptual
> (data) memory and a conceptual (metadata) memory- conscious and
> subconscious, if you prefer. Multiple relations (one-to-many, many-to-
> one and many-to-many) can be established between the elements of two
> memories and when new data is introduced to existing ones ("is
> learned"), it falls automatically ing into dynamic relationships with
> existing data in memory. A Porsche is European, red, flashy, fast, high
> speed, two seater... the new word Porsche is categorized right along
> with existing data that has these same relationships and is categorized
> in the same group as Ferrari, Lamborghini, BMW and so on. It is NOT
> categorized with Mustang, GTO, Accura, Toyota or Corvette because it is
> not related with "European". You KNOW the difference! Thus, we also
> achieve auto-categorization and specificity in retrieval. What is
> "innate human logic" in terms of semantic data structure? It is the
> same functionality which allows us to establish logical dynamic
> relationships amongst the data we learn everyday. Also to retrieve
> knowledge with 100% accuracy. Further, it provides contextual
> disambiguation, and provides universal grammar.
>
> What I am trying to understand is if what I am claiming about the
> semantic data structure makes any sense to any db experts. I guess I'm
> talking a different language... Would love to find a common road to
> get to Rome.
>
> I'd be happy to send more information by email to anyone that might have
> a deeper interest. I've attached another document discussing how we may
> utilize this structure as a next gen semantic web architecture.
>
> Thanks again!
>
> Wick
>
>
> --
> Posted via http://dbforums.com
Received on Wed Sep 03 2003 - 22:14:31 CEST