Re: does a table always need a PK?
Date: 31 Aug 2003 22:23:18 -0700
Message-ID: <57da7b56.0308312123.76e4d613_at_posting.google.com>
"Bob Badour" <bbadour_at_golden.net> wrote in message news:<Uhy4b.255$Oo5.28861511_at_mantis.golden.net>...
> Marshall, this idiot has not established that the relational data model is
> not implementable. It is more easily implementable than the SQL bag model.
> Have you seen how inelegant published theories become when they have to
> account for NULL and duplicates? Yuck!
>
> He ignored the RM when he did his implementation. That doesn't make it
> unimplementable.
Got a deal for you, Bob.
How about you ignore my posts in the same way you're ignoring Heikki's?
At this rate you will be ignoring everybody in a few weeks and we won't have to put up with you any more.
Deal? Received on Mon Sep 01 2003 - 07:23:18 CEST