Home
->
Usenet
->
comp.databases.theory
-> by thread
comp.databases.theory: by thread
30 messages
:
Starting
Mon Sep 01 2003 - 08:05:00 CEST,
Ending
Mon Sep 01 2003 - 04:28:05 CEST
This period
:
Most recent messages
sort by
: [ thread ] [
author
] [
date
] [
subject
]
Other periods
:[
Next, Thread view
] [
List of Folders
]
Nearby
: [
About this archive
] [
Other mail archives
]
Re: does a table always need a PK?
Marshall Spight
(Mon Sep 01 2003 - 03:01:58 CEST)
Re: does a table always need a PK?
Bob Badour
(Mon Sep 01 2003 - 03:19:09 CEST)
Re: does a table always need a PK?
Paul G. Brown
(Mon Sep 01 2003 - 04:28:05 CEST)
Re: does a table always need a PK?
Paul G. Brown
(Mon Sep 01 2003 - 07:19:16 CEST)
Re: does a table always need a PK?
Paul G. Brown
(Mon Sep 01 2003 - 07:23:18 CEST)
Re: Plural or singular table names
Ray Cassick \(home\)
(Mon Sep 01 2003 - 07:36:49 CEST)
Re: Query to combine two 'many:one' tables
Jens Süßmeyer
(Mon Sep 01 2003 - 08:05:00 CEST)
Re: Query to combine two 'many:one' tables
Jon Maz
(Mon Sep 01 2003 - 13:43:47 CEST)
Re: Plural or singular table names
TenKMan
(Tue Sep 02 2003 - 00:34:14 CEST)
Re: Plural or singular table names
Karsten Wutzke
(Tue Sep 09 2003 - 18:14:39 CEST)
Re: Is mysql a RDBMS ?
Bob Badour
(Tue Sep 02 2003 - 02:11:42 CEST)
Re: does a table always need a PK?
Jonathan Leffler
(Tue Sep 02 2003 - 06:31:08 CEST)
Re: does a table always need a PK?
Paul G. Brown
(Tue Sep 02 2003 - 07:46:20 CEST)
Re: does a table always need a PK?
Lauri Pietarinen
(Tue Sep 02 2003 - 09:11:56 CEST)
Re: does a table always need a PK?
Lee Fesperman
(Tue Sep 02 2003 - 10:22:18 CEST)
Re: does a table always need a PK?
Bob Badour
(Tue Sep 02 2003 - 14:50:37 CEST)
Re: does a table always need a PK?
Bob Badour
(Tue Sep 02 2003 - 14:48:29 CEST)
Re: does a table always need a PK?
Bob Badour
(Tue Sep 02 2003 - 15:03:38 CEST)
Re: does a table always need a PK?
Tony Douglas
(Tue Sep 02 2003 - 16:09:01 CEST)
Re: Dropping ACID - was Re: does a table always need a PK?
Christopher Browne
(Tue Sep 02 2003 - 16:53:12 CEST)
Re: Plural or singular table names
Bob Badour
(Tue Sep 02 2003 - 17:25:35 CEST)
Re: does a table always need a PK?
Lennart Jonsson
(Tue Sep 02 2003 - 19:07:40 CEST)
Re: does a table always need a PK?
Marshall Spight
(Tue Sep 02 2003 - 19:49:35 CEST)
Re: Plural or singular table names
Paul Vernon
(Tue Sep 02 2003 - 20:08:53 CEST)
Re: Plural or singular table names
Bob Badour
(Tue Sep 02 2003 - 20:33:50 CEST)
Re: does a table always need a PK?
Paul Vernon
(Tue Sep 02 2003 - 20:15:19 CEST)
Re: Dropping ACID - was Re: does a table always need a PK?
Paul Vernon
(Tue Sep 02 2003 - 20:11:18 CEST)
Re: does a table always need a PK?
Paul G. Brown
(Tue Sep 02 2003 - 21:40:47 CEST)
Re: does a table always need a PK?
Christopher Browne
(Tue Sep 02 2003 - 23:03:18 CEST)
Re: does a table always need a PK?
Mikito Harakiri
(Tue Sep 02 2003 - 23:57:45 CEST)
Re: does a table always need a PK?
Marshall Spight
(Wed Sep 03 2003 - 01:05:34 CEST)
Re: does a table always need a PK?
Marshall Spight
(Wed Sep 03 2003 - 01:14:26 CEST)
Re: Missing Information & Empty Sets.
byrmol
(Wed Sep 03 2003 - 00:45:31 CEST)
Re: does a table always need a PK?
Lee Fesperman
(Wed Sep 03 2003 - 02:42:52 CEST)
Re: does a table always need a PK?
Lee Fesperman
(Wed Sep 03 2003 - 02:53:04 CEST)
Re: does a table always need a PK?
Lee Fesperman
(Wed Sep 03 2003 - 03:05:59 CEST)
Re: does a table always need a PK?
Lee Fesperman
(Wed Sep 03 2003 - 03:08:48 CEST)
Re: does a table always need a PK?
Mikito Harakiri
(Wed Sep 03 2003 - 03:21:12 CEST)
Re: does a table always need a PK?
Mikito Harakiri
(Wed Sep 03 2003 - 03:23:47 CEST)
Re: Missing Information & Empty Sets.
Bob Badour
(Wed Sep 03 2003 - 03:21:56 CEST)
Re: does a table always need a PK?
Bob Badour
(Wed Sep 03 2003 - 03:40:22 CEST)
Re: does a table always need a PK?
Bob Badour
(Wed Sep 03 2003 - 03:45:49 CEST)
Re: does a table always need a PK?
Bob Badour
(Wed Sep 03 2003 - 03:51:35 CEST)
Re: does a table always need a PK?
Christopher Browne
(Wed Sep 03 2003 - 06:19:31 CEST)
Re: does a table always need a PK?
Christopher Browne
(Wed Sep 03 2003 - 06:19:32 CEST)
Re: does a table always need a PK?
Marshall Spight
(Wed Sep 03 2003 - 07:29:51 CEST)
Re: does a table always need a PK?
Lee Fesperman
(Wed Sep 03 2003 - 07:41:52 CEST)
Re: does a table always need a PK?
Lee Fesperman
(Wed Sep 03 2003 - 09:51:30 CEST)
Re: does a table always need a PK?
Lee Fesperman
(Wed Sep 03 2003 - 09:55:08 CEST)
Re: does a table always need a PK?
Christopher Browne
(Wed Sep 03 2003 - 14:18:53 CEST)
Re: Plural or singular table names
Paul Vernon
(Wed Sep 03 2003 - 12:17:18 CEST)
Re: types vs. views
Bob Badour
(Wed Sep 03 2003 - 16:52:22 CEST)
Re: types vs. views
Mikito Harakiri
(Wed Sep 03 2003 - 19:08:44 CEST)
Re: types vs. views
Bob Badour
(Wed Sep 03 2003 - 19:51:31 CEST)
Re: does a table always need a PK?
Bob Badour
(Wed Sep 03 2003 - 15:28:10 CEST)
Re: does a table always need a PK?
Bob Badour
(Wed Sep 03 2003 - 15:39:38 CEST)
Re: Plural or singular table names
Bob Badour
(Wed Sep 03 2003 - 15:52:24 CEST)
Re: Plural or singular table names
Bob Badour
(Wed Sep 03 2003 - 16:08:02 CEST)
Re: Relational algebra grammar?
Bob Badour
(Wed Sep 03 2003 - 16:17:15 CEST)
Re: Relational algebra grammar?
Amund Trovåg
(Wed Sep 03 2003 - 17:00:17 CEST)
Re: does a table always need a PK?
Lennart Jonsson
(Wed Sep 03 2003 - 16:47:48 CEST)
Re: does a table always need a PK?
Christopher Browne
(Wed Sep 03 2003 - 16:53:18 CEST)
Re: does a table always need a PK?
Mikito Harakiri
(Wed Sep 03 2003 - 18:09:02 CEST)
Re: does a table always need a PK?
Bob Badour
(Wed Sep 03 2003 - 18:24:44 CEST)
Re: does a table always need a PK?
Mikito Harakiri
(Wed Sep 03 2003 - 18:27:04 CEST)
Re: does a table always need a PK?
Bob Badour
(Wed Sep 03 2003 - 18:33:20 CEST)
Re: does a table always need a PK?
Mikito Harakiri
(Wed Sep 03 2003 - 19:44:50 CEST)
Re: Plural or singular table names
Paul Vernon
(Wed Sep 03 2003 - 19:43:33 CEST)
Re: Plural or singular table names
Paul Vernon
(Wed Sep 03 2003 - 19:44:00 CEST)
Re: Plural or singular table names
Bob Badour
(Wed Sep 03 2003 - 21:09:08 CEST)
Re: does a table always need a PK?
Christopher Browne
(Wed Sep 03 2003 - 21:52:52 CEST)
Re: does a table always need a PK?
Mikito Harakiri
(Wed Sep 03 2003 - 22:19:14 CEST)
Re: does a table always need a PK?
Mikito Harakiri
(Wed Sep 03 2003 - 22:59:21 CEST)
Re: does a table always need a PK?
Mikito Harakiri
(Wed Sep 03 2003 - 23:18:59 CEST)
Re: Relational algebra grammar?
Leandro Guimarães Faria Corsetti Dutra
(Thu Sep 04 2003 - 01:15:18 CEST)
Re: Is mysql a RDBMS ?
Leandro Guimarães Faria Corsetti Dutra
(Thu Sep 04 2003 - 01:21:27 CEST)
Re: does a table always need a PK?
Leandro Guimarães Faria Corsetti Dutra
(Thu Sep 04 2003 - 01:28:39 CEST)
Re: does a table always need a PK?
Leandro Guimarães Faria Corsetti Dutra
(Thu Sep 04 2003 - 01:31:00 CEST)
Re: Plural or singular table names
Marshall Spight
(Thu Sep 04 2003 - 02:12:44 CEST)
Re: semantic data structure/web architecture and innate logic
Marshall Spight
(Thu Sep 04 2003 - 02:33:19 CEST)
Re: Plural or singular table names
Bob Badour
(Thu Sep 04 2003 - 03:55:01 CEST)
Re: Plural or singular table names
Marshall Spight
(Thu Sep 04 2003 - 06:43:51 CEST)
Re: Plural or singular table names
Bob Badour
(Thu Sep 04 2003 - 14:30:05 CEST)
Values have types ??
Costin Cozianu
(Thu Sep 04 2003 - 19:20:32 CEST)
Re: Plural or singular table names
Paul Vernon
(Thu Sep 04 2003 - 12:15:43 CEST)
relation types
Bob Badour
(Thu Sep 04 2003 - 23:47:03 CEST)
Re: Plural or singular table names
Paul Vernon
(Thu Sep 04 2003 - 15:13:58 CEST)
Re: Plural or singular table names
Marshall Spight
(Thu Sep 04 2003 - 17:29:14 CEST)
relation types
Bob Badour
(Thu Sep 04 2003 - 23:24:05 CEST)
Re: Plural or singular table names
Bob Badour
(Thu Sep 04 2003 - 23:32:42 CEST)
Re: does a table always need a PK?
Lee Fesperman
(Thu Sep 04 2003 - 23:35:58 CEST)
Re: does a table always need a PK?
Christopher Browne
(Fri Sep 05 2003 - 00:52:27 CEST)
Re: Plural or singular table names
Paul
(Fri Sep 05 2003 - 01:26:40 CEST)
missing information and aggregates
Bob Badour
(Fri Sep 05 2003 - 01:53:54 CEST)
Re: missing information and aggregates
Mikito Harakiri
(Fri Sep 05 2003 - 18:46:23 CEST)
Re: Plural or singular table names
Larry Coon
(Fri Sep 05 2003 - 02:03:08 CEST)
Re: Plural or singular table names
Bob Badour
(Fri Sep 05 2003 - 02:27:34 CEST)
Re: relation types
Marshall Spight
(Fri Sep 05 2003 - 09:12:31 CEST)
Re: does a table always need a PK?
Tony Douglas
(Fri Sep 05 2003 - 12:00:48 CEST)
Re: E-R model and normalisation
Amund Trovåg
(Fri Sep 05 2003 - 12:57:34 CEST)
Temporal operations
Paul Vernon
(Fri Sep 05 2003 - 11:52:02 CEST)
Re: Temporal operations
Bob Badour
(Fri Sep 05 2003 - 16:25:41 CEST)
Re: Relational algebra grammar?
Amund Trovåg
(Fri Sep 05 2003 - 16:03:40 CEST)
Re: relation types
Paul Vernon
(Fri Sep 05 2003 - 16:31:49 CEST)
Do values have constraints?
Paul Vernon
(Fri Sep 05 2003 - 16:46:53 CEST)
Re: Do values have constraints?
Costin Cozianu
(Fri Sep 05 2003 - 21:23:07 CEST)
Re: Do values have constraints?
Bob Badour
(Fri Sep 05 2003 - 17:55:40 CEST)
Re: Do values have constraints?
Paul Vernon
(Fri Sep 05 2003 - 18:31:07 CEST)
Re: relation types
Bob Badour
(Fri Sep 05 2003 - 18:02:23 CEST)
Re: E-R model and normalisation
Alan
(Fri Sep 05 2003 - 18:39:39 CEST)
Re: Items in this newsgroup
Alan
(Fri Sep 05 2003 - 18:41:24 CEST)
Re: relation types
Paul Vernon
(Fri Sep 05 2003 - 18:53:46 CEST)
Re: Nested Sets and a typical Extranet Example
--CELKO--
(Fri Sep 05 2003 - 21:46:58 CEST)
Re: Items in this newsgroup
Leandro Guimarães Faria Corsetti Dutra
(Sat Sep 06 2003 - 00:59:30 CEST)
Re: types vs. views
Leandro Guimarães Faria Corsetti Dutra
(Sat Sep 06 2003 - 01:01:13 CEST)
Re: types vs. views
Leandro Guimarães Faria Corsetti Dutra
(Sat Sep 06 2003 - 01:02:06 CEST)
Re: Values have types ??
Leandro Guimarães Faria Corsetti Dutra
(Sat Sep 06 2003 - 01:09:08 CEST)
Re: Values have types ??
Costin Cozianu
(Sat Sep 06 2003 - 02:59:55 CEST)
Re: People missing out on good conversatoins
Leandro Guimarães Faria Corsetti Dutra
(Sat Sep 06 2003 - 01:11:44 CEST)
Re: missing information and aggregates
Bob Badour
(Sat Sep 06 2003 - 04:09:38 CEST)
Re: Do values have constraints?
Bob Badour
(Sat Sep 06 2003 - 04:42:26 CEST)
Re: Values have types ??
Leandro Guimarães Faria Corsetti Dutra
(Sat Sep 06 2003 - 11:16:20 CEST)
Re: Values have types ??
Costin Cozianu
(Sat Sep 06 2003 - 15:15:47 CEST)
Re: er-diagram
helango
(Sat Sep 06 2003 - 11:40:14 CEST)
Re: er-diagram
Leandro Guimarães Faria Corsetti Dutra
(Sat Sep 06 2003 - 14:50:59 CEST)
Re: Values have types ??
Bob Badour
(Sat Sep 06 2003 - 15:04:55 CEST)
Re: Values have types ??
Costin Cozianu
(Sat Sep 06 2003 - 15:38:40 CEST)
Re: Temporal operations
Paul G. Brown
(Sat Sep 06 2003 - 22:53:39 CEST)
Re: Temporal operations
Leandro Guimarães Faria Corsetti Dutra
(Sat Sep 06 2003 - 23:51:18 CEST)
Re: Values have types ??
Leandro Guimarães Faria Corsetti Dutra
(Sat Sep 06 2003 - 23:57:40 CEST)
Re: Values have types ??
Costin Cozianu
(Sun Sep 07 2003 - 02:23:59 CEST)
Re: Values have types ??
Bob Badour
(Sun Sep 07 2003 - 01:37:54 CEST)
Re: Values have types ??
Costin Cozianu
(Sun Sep 07 2003 - 02:38:53 CEST)
Re: Temporal operations
Bob Badour
(Sun Sep 07 2003 - 02:54:26 CEST)
Re: Temporal operations
Paul G. Brown
(Sun Sep 07 2003 - 09:59:20 CEST)
Re: missing information and aggregates
--CELKO--
(Sun Sep 07 2003 - 21:45:32 CEST)
Re: Values have types ??
Alfredo Novoa
(Mon Sep 08 2003 - 00:43:26 CEST)
Re: Values have types ??
Costin Cozianu
(Mon Sep 08 2003 - 03:58:38 CEST)
Re: Values have types ??
Alfredo Novoa
(Mon Sep 08 2003 - 00:52:36 CEST)
Re: Plural or singular table names
Alfredo Novoa
(Mon Sep 08 2003 - 01:31:15 CEST)
Re: Values have types ??
Bob Badour
(Mon Sep 08 2003 - 01:48:10 CEST)
Re: Plural or singular table names
Bob Badour
(Mon Sep 08 2003 - 01:59:30 CEST)
Re: missing information and aggregates
Lennart Jonsson
(Mon Sep 08 2003 - 05:58:47 CEST)
Re: Relational Calculus Operators. TRC and DRC in details please
Jonathan Leffler
(Mon Sep 08 2003 - 07:09:24 CEST)
Re: Possible problems with Date & McGoveran View Updating
Alfredo Novoa
(Mon Sep 08 2003 - 13:57:23 CEST)
Re: Possible problems with Date & McGoveran View Updating
Bob Badour
(Mon Sep 08 2003 - 14:55:19 CEST)
Re: Values have types ??
Alfredo Novoa
(Mon Sep 08 2003 - 18:18:37 CEST)
Re: how to set composite key as foreign key?
Anith Sen
(Mon Sep 08 2003 - 18:35:16 CEST)
Re: missing information and aggregates
Mikito Harakiri
(Mon Sep 08 2003 - 19:59:38 CEST)
Re: Possible problems with Date & McGoveran View Updating
Mikito Harakiri
(Mon Sep 08 2003 - 20:50:02 CEST)
Re: missing information and aggregates
Mikito Harakiri
(Mon Sep 08 2003 - 21:04:46 CEST)
Re: Values have types ??
Bob Badour
(Tue Sep 09 2003 - 01:01:11 CEST)
Re: Possible problems with Date & McGoveran View Updating
Bob Badour
(Tue Sep 09 2003 - 01:13:00 CEST)
Re: Possible problems with Date & McGoveran View Updating
Mikito Harakiri
(Tue Sep 09 2003 - 02:01:08 CEST)
View Updates Problem Statement
Mikito Harakiri
(Tue Sep 09 2003 - 02:45:19 CEST)
Re: View Updates Problem Statement
Mikito Harakiri
(Tue Sep 09 2003 - 03:02:15 CEST)
Re: View Updates Problem Statement
Bob Badour
(Tue Sep 09 2003 - 03:15:26 CEST)
Re: View Updates Problem Statement
Mikito Harakiri
(Tue Sep 09 2003 - 03:58:31 CEST)
Re: View Updates Problem Statement
Mikito Harakiri
(Tue Sep 09 2003 - 04:33:37 CEST)
Re: View Updates Problem Statement
Bob Badour
(Tue Sep 09 2003 - 17:15:39 CEST)
Re: View Updates Problem Statement
Bob Badour
(Tue Sep 09 2003 - 17:21:46 CEST)
Re: View Updates Problem Statement
Mikito Harakiri
(Tue Sep 09 2003 - 19:10:33 CEST)
Re: Possible problems with Date & McGoveran View Updating
Bob Badour
(Tue Sep 09 2003 - 03:09:39 CEST)
Re: Possible problems with Date & McGoveran View Updating
Mikito Harakiri
(Tue Sep 09 2003 - 04:17:56 CEST)
Re: Checkpoint Vs Savepoints
Jonathan Leffler
(Tue Sep 09 2003 - 06:25:52 CEST)
Re: Possible problems with Date & McGoveran View Updating
Bob Badour
(Tue Sep 09 2003 - 17:09:06 CEST)
Re: Possible problems with Date & McGoveran View Updating
Mikito Harakiri
(Tue Sep 09 2003 - 19:46:40 CEST)
Re: Nested Sets and a typical Extranet Example
rivers
(Tue Sep 09 2003 - 19:34:15 CEST)
Re: type of result column after heterogeneous join
Jan Hidders
(Tue Sep 09 2003 - 22:40:31 CEST)
Re: bag intersection definition
Jan Hidders
(Tue Sep 09 2003 - 23:03:51 CEST)
Re: Relational Calculus Operators. TRC and DRC in details please
Jan Hidders
(Tue Sep 09 2003 - 23:18:15 CEST)
Re: bag intersection definition
Mikito Harakiri
(Tue Sep 09 2003 - 23:33:10 CEST)
Re: Possible problems with Date & McGoveran View Updating
Alfredo Novoa
(Tue Sep 09 2003 - 23:40:30 CEST)
Re: Values have types ??
Alfredo Novoa
(Wed Sep 10 2003 - 00:15:49 CEST)
Re: Values have types ??
Costin Cozianu
(Wed Sep 10 2003 - 01:14:29 CEST)
Re: Possible problems with Date & McGoveran View Updating
Alfredo Novoa
(Wed Sep 10 2003 - 00:32:04 CEST)
Re: Plural or singular table names
--CELKO--
(Wed Sep 10 2003 - 02:52:52 CEST)
Re: Nested Sets and a typical Extranet Example
--CELKO--
(Wed Sep 10 2003 - 03:00:11 CEST)
Re: Checkpoint Vs Savepoints
Daniel Guntermann
(Wed Sep 10 2003 - 03:14:38 CEST)
Re: Possible problems with Date & McGoveran View Updating
Bob Badour
(Wed Sep 10 2003 - 05:01:21 CEST)
Re: Nested Sets and a typical Extranet Example
rivers
(Wed Sep 10 2003 - 04:39:43 CEST)
Re: View Updates Problem Statement
Bob Badour
(Wed Sep 10 2003 - 13:59:23 CEST)
Re: Possible problems with Date & McGoveran View Updating
Bob Badour
(Wed Sep 10 2003 - 14:06:38 CEST)
Re: Possible problems with Date & McGoveran View Updating
Mikito Harakiri
(Wed Sep 10 2003 - 19:24:39 CEST)
Re: Possible problems with Date & McGoveran View Updating
Jan Hidders
(Wed Sep 10 2003 - 20:14:25 CEST)
Re: Possible problems with Date & McGoveran View Updating
Mikito Harakiri
(Wed Sep 10 2003 - 21:05:47 CEST)
Re: Possible problems with Date & McGoveran View Updating
Jan Hidders
(Wed Sep 10 2003 - 22:52:33 CEST)
Re: relational algebra question
Riza
(Thu Sep 11 2003 - 03:43:13 CEST)
Re: relational algebra question
Bob Badour
(Thu Sep 11 2003 - 05:02:05 CEST)
Re: Possible problems with Date & McGoveran View Updating
Mikito Harakiri
(Thu Sep 11 2003 - 18:56:25 CEST)
Re: Possible problems with Date & McGoveran View Updating
Mikito Harakiri
(Thu Sep 11 2003 - 19:00:41 CEST)
Re: Possible problems with Date & McGoveran View Updating
Jan Hidders
(Thu Sep 11 2003 - 21:22:23 CEST)
Re: Possible problems with Date & McGoveran View Updating
Costin Cozianu
(Thu Sep 11 2003 - 22:43:15 CEST)
Re: Tropashko nested sets and materialized path - great idea but how do I insert?
Robin Tucker
(Fri Sep 12 2003 - 13:23:49 CEST)
Re: Plural or singular table names
Alfredo Novoa
(Fri Sep 12 2003 - 18:35:41 CEST)
Re: Possible problems with Date & McGoveran View Updating
Jan Hidders
(Fri Sep 12 2003 - 21:32:59 CEST)
Re: Plural or singular table names
Bob Badour
(Fri Sep 12 2003 - 22:32:53 CEST)
Re: Possible problems with Date & McGoveran View Updating
Mikito Harakiri
(Fri Sep 12 2003 - 23:02:37 CEST)
Re: foreign key to the *same* table?
Leandro Guimarães Faria Corsetti Dutra
(Sat Sep 13 2003 - 11:24:40 CEST)
Re: Plural or singular table names
Paul
(Sat Sep 13 2003 - 15:19:02 CEST)
Re: Plural or singular table names
--CELKO--
(Sun Sep 14 2003 - 01:11:35 CEST)
Re: Insert in DB2 many-to-many table
--CELKO--
(Sun Sep 14 2003 - 01:24:19 CEST)
Re: Possible problems with Date & McGoveran View Updating
Jan Hidders
(Sun Sep 14 2003 - 16:59:04 CEST)
Re: Tropashko nested sets and materialized path - great idea but how do I insert?
--CELKO--
(Sun Sep 14 2003 - 21:02:50 CEST)
Re: Tropashko nested sets and materialized path - great idea but how do I insert?
Mikito Harakiri
(Mon Sep 15 2003 - 05:07:15 CEST)
Re: Tropashko nested sets and materialized path - great idea but how do I insert?
Mikito Harakiri
(Mon Sep 15 2003 - 05:13:31 CEST)
Re: Possible problems with Date & McGoveran View Updating
Alfredo Novoa
(Mon Sep 15 2003 - 11:21:02 CEST)
Re: Tropashko nested sets and materialized path - great idea but how do I insert?
Robin Tucker
(Mon Sep 15 2003 - 15:28:37 CEST)
Re: Values have types ??
Alfredo Novoa
(Mon Sep 15 2003 - 18:58:57 CEST)
Re: Possible problems with Date & McGoveran View Updating
Mikito Harakiri
(Mon Sep 15 2003 - 19:08:17 CEST)
Re: Possible problems with Date & McGoveran View Updating
Jan Hidders
(Mon Sep 15 2003 - 20:00:56 CEST)
Re: Possible problems with Date & McGoveran View Updating
Jan Hidders
(Mon Sep 15 2003 - 20:01:47 CEST)
Re: Possible problems with Date & McGoveran View Updating
Mikito Harakiri
(Mon Sep 15 2003 - 21:31:25 CEST)
Re: Possible problems with Date & McGoveran View Updating
Mikito Harakiri
(Mon Sep 15 2003 - 21:44:05 CEST)
Re: Possible problems with Date & McGoveran View Updating
Jan Hidders
(Mon Sep 15 2003 - 22:03:27 CEST)
Jan's well-defined view updates definition
Mikito Harakiri
(Mon Sep 15 2003 - 22:47:08 CEST)
Re: Possible problems with Date & McGoveran View Updating
Jan Hidders
(Mon Sep 15 2003 - 22:19:31 CEST)
Corrected definition of locally invertible transformation
Mikito Harakiri
(Mon Sep 15 2003 - 23:18:25 CEST)
Re: Possible problems with Date & McGoveran View Updating
Mikito Harakiri
(Mon Sep 15 2003 - 23:30:59 CEST)
Re: Jan's well-defined view updates definition
Jan Hidders
(Tue Sep 16 2003 - 00:08:24 CEST)
Re: Corrected definition of locally invertible transformation
Jan Hidders
(Tue Sep 16 2003 - 00:15:37 CEST)
Re: More pain and sufferring with Tropashko's materialized path...
--CELKO--
(Tue Sep 16 2003 - 00:28:30 CEST)
Re: Corrected definition of locally invertible transformation
Mikito Harakiri
(Tue Sep 16 2003 - 01:00:08 CEST)
Re: Jan's well-defined view updates definition
Mikito Harakiri
(Tue Sep 16 2003 - 05:44:29 CEST)
Re: More pain and sufferring with Tropashko's materialized path...
Robin Tucker
(Tue Sep 16 2003 - 12:33:43 CEST)
Re: Possible problems with Date & McGoveran View Updating
Bob Badour
(Tue Sep 16 2003 - 13:56:37 CEST)
Re: Jan's well-defined view updates definition
Vadim Tropashko
(Tue Sep 16 2003 - 18:56:50 CEST)
Solving view transformantion equations
Mikito Harakiri
(Tue Sep 16 2003 - 21:01:13 CEST)
Re: Jan's well-defined view updates definition
Jan Hidders
(Tue Sep 16 2003 - 22:05:44 CEST)
Re: Jan's well-defined view updates definition
Mikito Harakiri
(Tue Sep 16 2003 - 23:57:16 CEST)
Re: Jan's well-defined view updates definition
Jan Hidders
(Wed Sep 17 2003 - 01:12:56 CEST)
Re: Jan's well-defined view updates definition
Mikito Harakiri
(Wed Sep 17 2003 - 04:07:49 CEST)
Re: Plural or singular table names
Alfredo Novoa
(Wed Sep 17 2003 - 15:49:48 CEST)
Re: Possible problems with Date & McGoveran View Updating
Alfredo Novoa
(Wed Sep 17 2003 - 16:25:20 CEST)
Re: Possible problems with Date & McGoveran View Updating
Alfredo Novoa
(Wed Sep 17 2003 - 17:01:11 CEST)
Re: Nested Sets and a typical Extranet Example
rivers
(Wed Sep 17 2003 - 17:23:28 CEST)
Re: Nested Sets and a typical Extranet Example
Robin Tucker
(Wed Sep 17 2003 - 18:43:57 CEST)
Re: Nested Sets and a typical Extranet Example
Robin Tucker
(Wed Sep 17 2003 - 19:33:19 CEST)
Re: More pain and sufferring with Tropashko's materialized path...
Vadim Tropashko
(Wed Sep 17 2003 - 22:45:58 CEST)
Re: Jan's well-defined view updates definition
Jan Hidders
(Wed Sep 17 2003 - 23:06:17 CEST)
Re: Foreign key pointing to multiple tables
Bernard Peek
(Thu Sep 18 2003 - 00:00:26 CEST)
Re: Jan's well-defined view updates definition
Bob Badour
(Thu Sep 18 2003 - 00:07:59 CEST)
Re: Jan's well-defined view updates definition
Jan Hidders
(Thu Sep 18 2003 - 10:34:24 CEST)
Re: Foreign key pointing to multiple tables
Jan Hidders
(Thu Sep 18 2003 - 00:27:48 CEST)
Re: Foreign key pointing to multiple tables
Tom Leylan
(Thu Sep 18 2003 - 04:16:49 CEST)
Re: More pain and sufferring with Tropashko's materialized path...
Robin Tucker
(Thu Sep 18 2003 - 12:42:40 CEST)
Re: Jan's well-defined view updates definition
Bob Badour
(Thu Sep 18 2003 - 14:51:17 CEST)
Re: Jan's well-defined view updates definition
Mikito Harakiri
(Thu Sep 18 2003 - 18:00:35 CEST)
Re: More pain and sufferring with Tropashko's materialized path...
--CELKO--
(Thu Sep 18 2003 - 19:21:29 CEST)
Re: More pain and sufferring with Tropashko's materialized path...
Mikito Harakiri
(Thu Sep 18 2003 - 19:31:32 CEST)
Re: Jan's well-defined view updates definition
Jan Hidders
(Thu Sep 18 2003 - 22:42:46 CEST)
Re: Conflicts in Relationships
Jan Hidders
(Fri Sep 19 2003 - 00:05:31 CEST)
Re: Jan's well-defined view updates definition
Jan Hidders
(Fri Sep 19 2003 - 00:38:27 CEST)
Re: Jan's well-defined view updates definition
Mikito Harakiri
(Fri Sep 19 2003 - 01:24:04 CEST)
Re: Jan's well-defined view updates definition
Jan Hidders
(Sat Sep 20 2003 - 02:02:24 CEST)
Re: Jan's well-defined view updates definition
Bob Badour
(Fri Sep 19 2003 - 03:35:39 CEST)
Re: Jan's well-defined view updates definition
Jan Hidders
(Sat Sep 20 2003 - 01:16:04 CEST)
Re: More pain and sufferring with Tropashko's materialized path...
Bob Badour
(Fri Sep 19 2003 - 05:07:27 CEST)
Re: Conflicts in Relationships
bill_dev
(Fri Sep 19 2003 - 06:00:14 CEST)
Re: Conflicts in Relationships
bill_dev
(Fri Sep 19 2003 - 06:36:35 CEST)
Re: Conflicts in Relationships
Jan Hidders
(Sat Sep 20 2003 - 01:12:12 CEST)
Re: Please update your Virus checkers - SWEN-A is rampant - and I'm getting squillions of emails.....
Christopher Browne
(Sat Sep 20 2003 - 00:16:35 CEST)
Re: Please update your Virus checkers - SWEN-A is rampant - and I'm getting squillions of emails.....
Samuel Hon
(Sat Sep 20 2003 - 00:38:57 CEST)
Re: Conflicts in Relationships
bill_dev
(Sat Sep 20 2003 - 02:51:57 CEST)
Re: Conflicts in Relationships
bill_dev
(Mon Sep 22 2003 - 03:20:14 CEST)
Re: Conflicts in Relationships
Jan Hidders
(Mon Sep 22 2003 - 11:42:47 CEST)
Re: Please update your Virus checkers - SWEN-A is rampant - and I'm getting squillions of emails.....
Scott Manson
(Sat Sep 20 2003 - 03:35:08 CEST)
Re: Please update your Virus checkers - SWEN-A is rampant - and I'm getting squillions of emails.....
Frans Bouma
(Sat Sep 20 2003 - 11:43:45 CEST)
Re: Please update your Virus checkers - SWEN-A is rampant - and I'm getting squillions of emails.....
Frans Bouma
(Sat Sep 20 2003 - 11:52:03 CEST)
Re: Values have types ??
Marshall Spight
(Sat Sep 20 2003 - 20:17:12 CEST)
Re: Foreign key pointing to multiple tables
--CELKO--
(Sat Sep 20 2003 - 21:54:33 CEST)
Re: Please update your Virus checkers - SWEN-A is rampant - and I'm getting squillions of emails.....
Kieran Benton
(Sat Sep 20 2003 - 23:51:30 CEST)
Re: Sql to Relational Algebra
Bob Badour
(Sun Sep 21 2003 - 03:26:48 CEST)
Re: semantic data structure/web architecture and innate logic
Wick
(Sun Sep 21 2003 - 07:10:27 CEST)
Re: semantic data structure/web architecture and innate logic
Wick
(Sun Sep 21 2003 - 07:26:52 CEST)
Re: semantic data structure/web architecture and innate logic
andrewst
(Sun Sep 21 2003 - 21:13:00 CEST)
Re: Foreign key pointing to multiple tables
Lennart Jonsson
(Sun Sep 21 2003 - 23:17:50 CEST)
Re: semantic data structure/web architecture and innate logic
Wick
(Mon Sep 22 2003 - 00:14:13 CEST)
Re: Sql to Relational Algebra
Joseph,,,
(Mon Sep 22 2003 - 06:36:41 CEST)
Re: semantic data structure/web architecture and innate logic
Kenny Yu
(Mon Sep 22 2003 - 08:05:24 CEST)
Re: semantic data structure/web architecture and innate logic
Bob Badour
(Mon Sep 22 2003 - 12:55:07 CEST)
Re: semantic data structure/web architecture and innate logic
Alfredo Novoa
(Mon Sep 22 2003 - 13:18:35 CEST)
Re: Foreign key pointing to multiple tables
Kenny Yu
(Mon Sep 22 2003 - 21:17:23 CEST)
Re: Foreign key pointing to multiple tables
--CELKO--
(Mon Sep 22 2003 - 21:30:05 CEST)
Re: Nested Sets and a typical Extranet Example
Kenny Yu
(Tue Sep 23 2003 - 00:11:32 CEST)
Re: Foreign key pointing to multiple tables
Lennart Jonsson
(Tue Sep 23 2003 - 07:57:15 CEST)
Re: Nested Sets and Delete/Exchange?
--CELKO--
(Wed Sep 24 2003 - 01:16:44 CEST)
Re: Nested Sets and Delete/Exchange?
Dietmar Simons
(Wed Sep 24 2003 - 01:23:16 CEST)
Re: Nested Sets and Delete/Exchange?
Heinz Huber
(Wed Sep 24 2003 - 10:23:54 CEST)
Re: Tutorial on Database design: where ???
Michael Gast
(Mon Sep 01 2003 - 10:25:59 CEST)
Re: does a table always need a PK?
Lauri Pietarinen
(Mon Sep 01 2003 - 12:05:53 CEST)
Re: does a table always need a PK?
Morten Gulbrandsen
(Mon Sep 01 2003 - 12:09:44 CEST)
Re: does a table always need a PK?
Tony Douglas
(Mon Sep 01 2003 - 12:59:05 CEST)
Re: does a table always need a PK?
Tony Douglas
(Mon Sep 01 2003 - 14:53:27 CEST)
Re: does a table always need a PK?
Morten Gulbrandsen
(Mon Sep 01 2003 - 14:54:50 CEST)
Re: does a table always need a PK?
Lauri Pietarinen
(Mon Sep 01 2003 - 15:10:29 CEST)
Re: does a table always need a PK?
Bob Badour
(Mon Sep 01 2003 - 15:36:07 CEST)
Re: does a table always need a PK?
Paul G. Brown
(Mon Sep 01 2003 - 21:47:43 CEST)
Re: does a table always need a PK?
Lauri Pietarinen
(Mon Sep 01 2003 - 23:21:56 CEST)
Re: does a table always need a PK?
Paul Vernon
(Mon Sep 01 2003 - 23:11:54 CEST)
Re: type of result column after heterogeneous join
Paul Vernon
(Mon Sep 01 2003 - 15:12:29 CEST)
Re: type of result column after heterogeneous join
Marshall Spight
(Mon Sep 01 2003 - 19:28:48 CEST)
Re: Plural or singular table names
Tony Douglas
(Mon Sep 01 2003 - 17:44:30 CEST)
Re: Plural or singular table names
Bob Badour
(Mon Sep 01 2003 - 19:10:14 CEST)
Re: Plural or singular table names
Paul Vernon
(Mon Sep 01 2003 - 20:19:32 CEST)
Re: Plural or singular table names
Paul Vernon
(Mon Sep 01 2003 - 20:38:03 CEST)
Re: Plural or singular table names
Paul Vernon
(Mon Sep 01 2003 - 20:33:09 CEST)
Re: Plural or singular table names
Bob Badour
(Mon Sep 01 2003 - 22:17:24 CEST)
Re: Plural or singular table names
Paul Vernon
(Mon Sep 01 2003 - 23:58:24 CEST)
Re: Dropping ACID - was Re: does a table always need a PK?
Paul Vernon
(Mon Sep 01 2003 - 20:52:07 CEST)
Re: Is mysql a RDBMS ?
Paul Vernon
(Mon Sep 01 2003 - 23:00:12 CEST)
Last message date
:
Mon Sep 01 2003 - 04:28:05 CEST
Archived on
: Sun Jun 26 2016 - 11:26:50 CEST
30 messages
sort by
: [ thread ] [
author
] [
date
] [
subject
]
Other periods
:[
Next, Thread view
] [
List of Folders
]
Nearby
: [
About this archive
] [
Other mail archives
]
.::
Blogger Home
::
Wiki Home
::
Forum Home
::
Privacy
::
Contact
::.