Re: does a table always need a PK?

"Bob Badour" <bbadour_at_golden.net> wrote in message news:wih3b.55$4t3.8695867_at_mantis.golden.net...
>
> "Heikki Tuuri" <Heikki.Tuuri_at_innodb.com> wrote in message
> news:iSY2b.82$n62.17_at_read3.inet.fi...
> > Bob,
> >
> > "Bob Badour" <bbadour_at_golden.net> kirjoitti viestissä
> > news:9YT2b.991$Nl3.88821886_at_mantis.golden.net...
> > > "Heikki Tuuri" <Heikki.Tuuri_at_innodb.com> wrote in message
> > > news:SiQ2b.467$4X.270_at_read3.inet.fi...
> >
> > ...
> > > > > Are you aware of any sound theory purporting to deal with the
> problem
> > of
> > > > > missing information?
> > > >
> > > > Hmm... 3-valued logic itself is a sound theory, I guess.
> > >
> > > Your answer indicates a profound lack of competence and strongly
> suggests
> > a
> > > lack of honesty and integrity.
> > >
> > >
> > > > But I think it is
> > > > computationally too complex and possibly undecidable.
> > >
> > > Your elaboration compounds the evidence of incompetence and confirms
the
> > > impression of dishonesty and unscrupulousness.
> >
> > see the posting of Jan Hidders and my reply to it.

Sorry, I hit send by mistake.

See my reply to it. While I would love to give you the benefit of the doubt, I have a strong suspicion of further pedantic sophistry. Received on Thu Aug 28 2003 - 07:17:55 CEST