Re: does a table always need a PK?

From: Bob Badour <bbadour_at_golden.net>
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2003 01:11:27 -0400
Message-ID: <wih3b.55$4t3.8695867_at_mantis.golden.net>


"Heikki Tuuri" <Heikki.Tuuri_at_innodb.com> wrote in message news:iSY2b.82$n62.17_at_read3.inet.fi...
> Bob,
>
> "Bob Badour" <bbadour_at_golden.net> kirjoitti viestissä
> news:9YT2b.991$Nl3.88821886_at_mantis.golden.net...
> > "Heikki Tuuri" <Heikki.Tuuri_at_innodb.com> wrote in message
> > news:SiQ2b.467$4X.270_at_read3.inet.fi...
>
> ...
> > > > Are you aware of any sound theory purporting to deal with the
problem
> of
> > > > missing information?
> > >
> > > Hmm... 3-valued logic itself is a sound theory, I guess.
> >
> > Your answer indicates a profound lack of competence and strongly
suggests
> a
> > lack of honesty and integrity.
> >
> >
> > > But I think it is
> > > computationally too complex and possibly undecidable.
> >
> > Your elaboration compounds the evidence of incompetence and confirms the
> > impression of dishonesty and unscrupulousness.
>
> see the posting of Jan Hidders and my reply to it.
>
> ...
>
> Best regards,
>
> Heikki Tuuri
> Innobase Oy
> http://www.innodb.com
> Foreign keys, transactions, and row level locking for MySQL
> InnoDB Hot Backup - a hot backup tool for MySQL
>
>
Received on Thu Aug 28 2003 - 07:11:27 CEST

Original text of this message