Re: A neutral challenge.
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 16:00:39 GMT
Message-ID: <HSZKa.761$Ks2.68590664_at_newssvr15.news.prodigy.com>
"Bob Badour" <bbadour_at_golden.net> wrote in message
news:UYLKa.588$Sp2.78550140_at_mantis.golden.net...
> "Peter Koch Larsen" <pkl_at_mailme.dk> wrote in message
> news:61c84197.0306261140.6454f73c_at_posting.google.com...
> > "Bob Badour" <bbadour_at_golden.net> wrote in message
> news:<FPrKa.542$5O7.72062052_at_mantis.golden.net>...
> > [snip]
> > >
> > > Back to the scheduling problem you propose, what granularity of
schedule
> did
> > > you envision? I notice all the times are even hours. Is that just
> > > incidental? Or do you propose a calendar to schedule events on an
hourly
> > > basis?
> >
> > Ideally, my belief is that the granularity should be arbitrarily small
> > - this will make the solution applicable for other jinds of schedules
> > as well. If you do choose a specific interval this should be allowed,
> > but in that case I would expect some explanation as to why this
> > specific interval was chosen.
> >
> > For the rest of your post allow me to return later.
>
> I don't think it makes sense to schedule rooms to the nanosecond. To the
> quarter-hour is probably as great a granularity as anyone would ever
really
> use in practice and to the minute should provide a safe enough margin of
> over engineering.
>
Ideally, the database layer should be able to handle any reasonable granularity and let the front end restrict it to whatever the policies are. Received on Fri Jun 27 2003 - 18:00:39 CEST